Comparison Overview

City of Hayward

VS

Internal Revenue Service

City of Hayward

777 B Street, None, Hayward, California, US, 94541
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 600 and 649

Hayward is a Charter City of 62.55 square miles and 145,839 residents governed under the Council-Manager form of government. Hayward is known as the “Heart of the Bay” because of its central and convenient location in Alameda County – 25 miles southeast of San Francisco, 14 miles south of Oakland, 26 miles north of San Jose and 10 miles west of the valley communities surrounding Pleasanton. Serviced by an extensive network of freeways and bus lines, Hayward has two BART stations (Hayward and South Hayward), an Amtrak station, and the Hayward Executive Airport, with easy access to San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose airports. Hayward's Executive Airport is a general aviation facility utilized by a multitude of diverse aircraft ranging from corporate jets to flying for enjoyment in small privately-owned aircraft. It is considered by many to be the Bay Area’s premier executive general aviation airport and provides a wide variety of aviation services to aircraft operators. Hayward’s diversity is not only reflected in our residents, but also in the variety of outstanding businesses that have chosen to locate and maintain their enterprises in our community. The investment of business and industry in our community is appreciated and valued. Continued partnerships between business, residents, education, and government are essential to ensure Hayward’s ongoing success as the “Heart of the Bay” and to our growing reputation as being “Open for Business.”

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 542
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Internal Revenue Service

1111 Constitution Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the Internal Revenue Service’s official LinkedIn account. Here, you will find the latest and greatest news and updates for taxpayers to help them understand and meet their tax responsibilities. Also, this is a place to learn about a meaningful career with the IRS. Check out the tabs above to learn more about us and view job openings. The U.S. government does not promote or endorse any non-government or commercial content appearing on this page. This service is operated by a third party and not an official government website. The IRS strongly discourages you from providing personally identifiable information. Read our privacy policy at www.irs.gov/privacy

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 47,895
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hayward.jpeg
City of Hayward
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/irs.jpeg
Internal Revenue Service
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Hayward
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Internal Revenue Service
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Hayward in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Internal Revenue Service has 51.52% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — City of Hayward (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Hayward cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Internal Revenue Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Internal Revenue Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hayward.jpeg
City of Hayward
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/irs.jpeg
Internal Revenue Service
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: stolen personal information, phishing, data breach (unspecified)
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Internal Revenue Service company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Hayward company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Hayward and Internal Revenue Service have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Internal Revenue Service company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Hayward company.

City of Hayward company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Internal Revenue Service company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Internal Revenue Service company and City of Hayward company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Internal Revenue Service company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while City of Hayward company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Hayward company nor Internal Revenue Service company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Hayward nor Internal Revenue Service holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither City of Hayward company nor Internal Revenue Service company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Internal Revenue Service company employs more people globally than City of Hayward company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Hayward nor Internal Revenue Service holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Hayward nor Internal Revenue Service holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Hayward nor Internal Revenue Service holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Hayward nor Internal Revenue Service holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Hayward nor Internal Revenue Service holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Hayward nor Internal Revenue Service holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X