Comparison Overview

City of Fresno

VS

Social Security Administration

City of Fresno

US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Official LinkedIn for the City of Fresno - the 5th largest city in California #OneFresno

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,100
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Social Security Administration

6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, MD, US, 21235
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

Social Security provides financial protection for our nation’s people, supporting more than 64 million individuals and families. With retirement, disability, and survivors benefits, Social Security is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation's history. We are there throughout life’s journey, helping secure today and tomorrow. We are one of the largest independent agencies in government, with over 58,000 team members throughout the country. Our talented workforce includes employees who serve customers directly, as well as those who support their work in diverse fields. Through compassion and dedication, our team members help promote the economic security of the country. They are the heart of our agency, providing high-quality, personalized service to people in their communities, nationwide, and even living abroad. Our workforce is our greatest strength at SSA. We place high priority on developing, engaging, and empowering our team members. Through career development programs, our team members have access to a wide range of training and professional development opportunities. We rely on our team members’ feedback to improve how we administer our programs and to create an environment of trust and cooperation across our organization. We also offer an excellent benefits package to our team members. To learn more about a career with SSA, visit SSA.gov/careers.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 46,254
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-fresno.jpeg
City of Fresno
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Fresno
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Social Security Administration
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Fresno in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Social Security Administration has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — City of Fresno (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Fresno cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Social Security Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social Security Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-fresno.jpeg
City of Fresno
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ssa.jpeg
Social Security Administration
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

City of Fresno company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Social Security Administration company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Fresno and Social Security Administration have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Social Security Administration company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Fresno company.

Neither Social Security Administration company nor City of Fresno company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Social Security Administration company has disclosed at least one data breach, while City of Fresno company has not reported such incidents publicly.

City of Fresno company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Social Security Administration company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Fresno company nor Social Security Administration company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Fresno nor Social Security Administration holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Social Security Administration company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Fresno company.

Social Security Administration company employs more people globally than City of Fresno company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Fresno nor Social Security Administration holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Social Security Administration holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Social Security Administration holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Social Security Administration holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Social Security Administration holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Social Security Administration holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.