Comparison Overview

City of Farmington Hills

VS

Pacific Strategies

City of Farmington Hills

31555 W Eleven Mile Rd, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48371, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fhgov.com

Farmington Hills, Oakland County’s premier address, is a world-class business center that has positioned itself as a sustainable economic powerhouse. Farmington Hills has nurtured the growth of 3,500 businesses from start-ups to International Fortune 500 companies and everything in between. With a high quality of life, an exceptional location, and a bright future, Farmington Hills is the place in southeast Michigan to locate both your business and your family.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 368
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pacific Strategies

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pacific-strategies.com

Orange County-based public affairs consultancy specializing in strategic communications, social media, government relations, community outreach strategies and opinion management. Our principals bring many years senior-level public affairs experience, garnered in both the private and public sectors, working with organizations and individuals at the national, state and local level. Clients benefit from sound strategic counsel and support to guide them successfully through the public policy arena. We help local governments build modern, transparent public communications infrastructure that take full advantage of powerful social media tools -- enabling them to engage in productive, positive communication with constituents, as well as internally. Our current and past clients include: Irvine Ranch Water District, the City of Anaheim, the Orange County Transportation Authority, the City of Westminster, the Children and Families Commission of Orange County and the Orange County District Attorney’s office.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-farmington-hills.jpeg
City of Farmington Hills
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Farmington Hills
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pacific Strategies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Farmington Hills in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Strategies in 2025.

Incident History — City of Farmington Hills (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Farmington Hills cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pacific Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-farmington-hills.jpeg
City of Farmington Hills
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pacific Strategies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Farmington Hills company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pacific Strategies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to City of Farmington Hills company.

In the current year, Pacific Strategies company and City of Farmington Hills company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor City of Farmington Hills company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor City of Farmington Hills company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor City of Farmington Hills company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Farmington Hills company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Farmington Hills nor Pacific Strategies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither City of Farmington Hills company nor Pacific Strategies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

City of Farmington Hills company employs more people globally than Pacific Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither City of Farmington Hills nor Pacific Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Farmington Hills nor Pacific Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Farmington Hills nor Pacific Strategies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Farmington Hills nor Pacific Strategies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Farmington Hills nor Pacific Strategies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Farmington Hills nor Pacific Strategies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References