Comparison Overview

City of Durant

VS

City of Los Angeles

City of Durant

300 W Evergreen, Durant, 74701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-01
Between 550 and 599

Durant is a city in Bryan County, Oklahoma, United States and serves as the capital of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. The population was 18,589 at the 2020 census. Durant is the principal city of the Durant Micropolitan Statistical Area, which had a population of 42,416 in 2010. Durant ranks as the second largest city within the Choctaw Nation, following McAlester, and ahead of Poteau. Durant is also part of the Dallas-Fort Worth Combined Statistical Area, anchoring the northern edge. The city was founded by Dixon Durant, a Choctaw who lived in the area,after the MK&T railroad came through the Indian Territory in the early 1870s. It became the county seat of Bryan County in 1907 after Oklahoma statehood. Durant is home to Southeastern Oklahoma State University and the headquarters of the Choctaw Nation. The city is officially known as the Magnolia Capital of Oklahoma. The city and its micropolitan are a major part of the Texoma region.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

City of Los Angeles

200 North Spring St., Los Angeles, California, US, 90012
Last Update: 2026-01-01

The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Council-Commission form of government, as originally adopted by voters of the City of Los Angeles, effective July 1, 1925, and reaffirmed by a new Charter effective July 1, 2000. A Mayor, City Controller, and City Attorney are elected by City residents every four years. Fifteen City Council members representing fifteen districts are elected by the people for four-year terms, for a maximum of two terms. Members of Commissions are generally appointed by the Mayor, subject to the approval of the City Council. General Managers of the various City departments are also appointed by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Most employees of the City are subject to the civil service provisions of the City Charter.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 15,569
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-durant-oklahoma.jpeg
City of Durant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Durant
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Los Angeles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Durant has 53.27% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Los Angeles in 2026.

Incident History — City of Durant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Durant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Los Angeles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Los Angeles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-durant-oklahoma.jpeg
City of Durant
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Los Angeles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Durant company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Durant company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Los Angeles company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Durant company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Los Angeles company.

City of Durant company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor City of Durant company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor City of Durant company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Durant company nor City of Los Angeles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Durant nor City of Los Angeles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Los Angeles company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Durant company.

City of Los Angeles company employs more people globally than City of Durant company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Durant nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Durant nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Durant nor City of Los Angeles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Durant nor City of Los Angeles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Durant nor City of Los Angeles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Durant nor City of Los Angeles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of International Color Consortium (ICC) color management profiles. Versions prior to 2.3.1.2 have a NULL pointer member call vulnerability. This vulnerability affects users of the iccDEV library who process ICC color profiles. Version 2.3.1.2 contains a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Themify Themify Sidepane WordPress Theme, Themify Themify Newsy, Themify Themify Folo, Themify Themify Edmin, Themify Bloggie, Themify Photobox, Themify Wigi, Themify Rezo, Themify Slide allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Themify Sidepane WordPress Theme: from n/a through 1.9.8; Themify Newsy: from n/a through 1.9.9; Themify Folo: from n/a through 1.9.6; Themify Edmin: from n/a through 2.0.0; Bloggie: from n/a through 2.0.8; Photobox: from n/a through 2.0.1; Wigi: from n/a through 2.0.1; Rezo: from n/a through 1.9.7; Slide: from n/a through 1.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in AA-Team Woocommerce Sales Funnel Builder, AA-Team Amazon Affiliates Addon for WPBakery Page Builder (formerly Visual Composer) allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Woocommerce Sales Funnel Builder: from n/a through 1.1; Amazon Affiliates Addon for WPBakery Page Builder (formerly Visual Composer): from n/a through 1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in AA-Team Premium Age Verification / Restriction for WordPress, AA-Team Responsive Coming Soon Landing Page / Holding Page for WordPress allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Premium Age Verification / Restriction for WordPress: from n/a through 3.0.2; Responsive Coming Soon Landing Page / Holding Page for WordPress: from n/a through 3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed attacker controlled HTML to be rendered by the Filter component (search) across GitHub that could be used to exfiltrate sensitive information. An attacker would require permissions to create or modify the names of milestones, issues, pull requests, or similar entities that are rendered in the vulnerable filter/search components. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.20 and was fixed in versions 3.19.1, and 3.18.2, 3.17.8, 3.16.11, 3.15.15, and 3.14.20. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X