Comparison Overview

City of Dallas

VS

State of Maryland

City of Dallas

1500 Marilla Street, None, Dallas, TX, US, 75201
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Municipal government of Dallas, Texas, USA. Dallas is the ninth largest city in the United States, with over 1.3 million residents. The City of Dallas operates with over 13,000 employees and an annual budget of $3.6 Billion. Welcome to Dallas Committed to "Service First"​ Excellence Our core values are Empathy, Ethics, Excellence, Equity

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 6,659
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

State of Maryland

301 W. Preston Street, Baltimore, Maryland, US, 21201
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Maryland is on the path to becoming the best state in the nation. Referred to as “America in Miniature”, Maryland embodies the very spirit of the United States. Maryland is home to ethnic groups of every origin, just about every natural feature, and much like our country, opportunity! If you are interested in a rewarding career in public service, consider the following: Full-time employment Part-time employment Contractual work Internships Seasonal work Maryland, where your work truly matters… Join us! State Jobs: https://www.jobaps.com/md/ State of Maryland homepage: http://www.maryland.gov/Pages/default.aspx

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 10,256
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-dallas.jpeg
City of Dallas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-maryland.jpeg
State of Maryland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Dallas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of Maryland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Dallas has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Maryland in 2025.

Incident History — City of Dallas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Dallas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of Maryland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Maryland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-dallas.jpeg
City of Dallas
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Double-extortion tactics, voice-based social engineering
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Phishing Email
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Leakage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-maryland.jpeg
State of Maryland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

State of Maryland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Dallas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Dallas company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas State of Maryland company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Dallas company has reported more cyber incidents than State of Maryland company.

City of Dallas company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while State of Maryland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State of Maryland company nor City of Dallas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither State of Maryland company nor City of Dallas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Dallas company nor State of Maryland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Dallas nor State of Maryland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither City of Dallas company nor State of Maryland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

State of Maryland company employs more people globally than City of Dallas company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Dallas nor State of Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Dallas nor State of Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Dallas nor State of Maryland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Dallas nor State of Maryland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Dallas nor State of Maryland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Dallas nor State of Maryland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N