Comparison Overview

City of Cologne

VS

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

City of Cologne

DE
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Sie möchten sich neu ansiedeln, Ihren Betrieb erweitern oder Ihr Unternehmen verlagern. Sie suchen ein neues Grundstück oder eine Immobilie. Sie möchten ein gewerblich nutzbares Grundstück vermieten, verpachten oder veräußern. Sie haben ein Anliegen an die Stadtverwaltung (zum Beispiel Planungsrecht, Baugenehmigungen, Denkmalschutz, Grünausgleich etc.). Sie möchten Ihr Netzwerk erweitern und neue Kontakte in Köln knüpfen.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Lehae La Sars, 299 Bronkhorst Street, Pretoria, Gauteng, ZA, 0001
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection against the illegal importation and exportation of goods; facilitate trade; and advise the Minister of Finance on all revenue matters

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
City of Cologne
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sars.jpeg
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Cologne
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Cologne in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2025.

Incident History — City of Cologne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Cologne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South African Revenue Service (SARS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South African Revenue Service (SARS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
City of Cologne
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: DDoS
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sars.jpeg
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

South African Revenue Service (SARS) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Cologne company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Cologne company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported any.

In the current year, South African Revenue Service (SARS) company and City of Cologne company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South African Revenue Service (SARS) company nor City of Cologne company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South African Revenue Service (SARS) company nor City of Cologne company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

City of Cologne company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Cologne company nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Cologne nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither City of Cologne company nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South African Revenue Service (SARS) company employs more people globally than City of Cologne company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Cologne nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N