Comparison Overview

City of Cologne

VS

GSA

City of Cologne

DE
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://koeln.business/de/wirtschaft-in-koeln/

Sie möchten sich neu ansiedeln, Ihren Betrieb erweitern oder Ihr Unternehmen verlagern. Sie suchen ein neues Grundstück oder eine Immobilie. Sie möchten ein gewerblich nutzbares Grundstück vermieten, verpachten oder veräußern. Sie haben ein Anliegen an die Stadtverwaltung (zum Beispiel Planungsrecht, Baugenehmigungen, Denkmalschutz, Grünausgleich etc.). Sie möchten Ihr Netzwerk erweitern und neue Kontakte in Köln knüpfen.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

GSA

1800 F St. NW, Washington, D.C., US, 20405
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gsa.gov

General Services Administration (GSA) is an independent agency of the United States government established in 1949 to help manage and support the basic functioning of federal agencies. Our organization includes the Public Buildings Service (PBS), Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), and a variety of Service and Staff Offices. Learn more about our organization at gsa.gov. Our Mission GSA's mission is to deliver value and savings in real estate, acquisition, technology, and other mission-support services across government. Our Vision Effective and efficient government for the American people. Our Values Service, Accountability, and Innovation ----------- You can also find us on these social media sites: Twitter: https://twitter.com/usgsa Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GSA/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usgsa/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,462
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
City of Cologne
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Cologne
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Cologne in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSA in 2025.

Incident History — City of Cologne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Cologne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
City of Cologne
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: DDoS
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Cologne company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Cologne company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GSA company has not reported any.

In the current year, GSA company and City of Cologne company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GSA company nor City of Cologne company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GSA company nor City of Cologne company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

City of Cologne company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GSA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Cologne company nor GSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Cologne nor GSA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GSA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Cologne company.

GSA company employs more people globally than City of Cologne company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Cologne nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor GSA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor GSA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor GSA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Cologne nor GSA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References