Comparison Overview

Citara Systems

VS

Globant

Citara Systems

65 Boston Post Rd West, Marlborough, Massachusetts, 01752, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Citara Systems built its reputation by providing IT management services and support from a business perspective. We've been doing IT right for more than 14 years, as a regional IT services leader headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts and serving customers all over Massachusetts and neighboring states. We're accountable for quantifying and measuring the cost savings, business productivity gains, sales or customer service improvements. With Citara Systems as your single point of contact for all things IT, you can: •Enjoy greater productivity - less downtime translates into more work time •Concentrate on your core business - while we handle all of your technology needs •Focus on new opportunities - with technology that grows as your business grows •Protect everything you’ve worked for - our security systems ensure your data and network are safe •Experience peace of mind - knowing your technology is running smoothly

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Globant

875 Howard St, San Francisco, CA, 94103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

At Globant, we create the digitally-native products that people love. We bridge the gap between businesses and consumers through technology and creativity, leveraging our experience as an AI powerhouse. We dare to digitally transform organizations and strive to delight their customers. - We have more than 29,100 employees and are present in 33 countries across 5 continents, working for companies like Google, Electronic Arts, and Santander, among others. - We were named a Worldwide Leader in AI Services (2023) and a Worldwide Leader in CX Improvement Services (2020) by IDC MarketScape report. - We are the fastest-growing IT brand and the 5th strongest IT brand globally (2024), according to Brand Finance. - We were featured as a business case study at Harvard, MIT, and Stanford. - We are active members of The Green Software Foundation (GSF) and the Cybersecurity Tech Accord. For more information, visit https://bit.ly/globant_com Follow us: http://www.twitter.com/globant http://www.youtube.com/Globant http://www.facebook.com/Globant https://instagram.com/Globant https://www.tiktok.com/@globant

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 28,472
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citara-systems.jpeg
Citara Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globant.jpeg
Globant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Citara Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Globant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Citara Systems has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Globant in 2025.

Incident History — Citara Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citara Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Globant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Globant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citara-systems.jpeg
Citara Systems
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Web Application Firewall (WAF) False Positive
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globant.jpeg
Globant
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials, Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Globant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Citara Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Citara Systems and Globant have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Citara Systems company has reported more cyber incidents than Globant company.

Neither Globant company nor Citara Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Globant company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Citara Systems company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Citara Systems company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Globant company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Citara Systems company nor Globant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Citara Systems nor Globant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Globant company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Citara Systems company.

Globant company employs more people globally than Citara Systems company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Citara Systems nor Globant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Citara Systems nor Globant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Citara Systems nor Globant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Citara Systems nor Globant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Citara Systems nor Globant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Citara Systems nor Globant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X