Comparison Overview

Cistor

VS

Z Networks Inc

Cistor

Third Avenue, Poynton, Cheshire, SK12 1YL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

At Cistor, we specialise in both new and authorised remanufactured networking technology. Our remanufactured equipment is all OEM (original equipment manufacturer) certified and comes with the same warranty, quality and support as buying new. We’re a small team with over 14 years’ experience and are part of a larger Sustainable IT Group. This structure means we’re quick and agile. While also offering the deep expertise, global reach and economies of scale that only a larger business can offer. Together, we can take on your toughest IT challenges. Whether you’re searching for hard to find equipment, extending the life of your technology platform or extending your global networking inventory – we’ll find a solution. One that’s more sustainable, resilient and cost effective.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Z Networks Inc

655 South Orcas Street, Seattle, WA, 98108, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Our Commitment at Z Networks, we know that your business has better things to do than worry about IT problems. We provide IT support and technology directly to businesses, so you can focus on the success of your business. When you partner with Z Networks, you can be sure that you've gained a valuable IT partner that will work tirelessly to support your business. We are committed to Proactive Planning and Long-Term Strategy. Z Networks long-term technology plans are tailored to meet the specific needs of our clients and to drive results for their businesses. These plans include: supporting your processes, security policies, migration strategies, and device replacement/warranty schedules. We analyze the components each technology plan monthly and evaluate any changes that may be needed.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cistor-ltd.jpeg
Cistor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/z-networks-inc.jpeg
Z Networks Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cistor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Z Networks Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cistor in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Z Networks Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Cistor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cistor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Z Networks Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Z Networks Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cistor-ltd.jpeg
Cistor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/z-networks-inc.jpeg
Z Networks Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Z Networks Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cistor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Z Networks Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cistor company.

In the current year, Z Networks Inc company and Cistor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Z Networks Inc company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Z Networks Inc company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Z Networks Inc company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cistor company nor Z Networks Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cistor nor Z Networks Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Z Networks Inc company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cistor company.

Z Networks Inc company employs more people globally than Cistor company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Cistor nor Z Networks Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cistor nor Z Networks Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cistor nor Z Networks Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cistor nor Z Networks Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cistor nor Z Networks Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cistor nor Z Networks Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.