Comparison Overview

Cistor

VS

UiTech

Cistor

Third Avenue, Poynton, Cheshire, SK12 1YL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

At Cistor, we specialise in both new and authorised remanufactured networking technology. Our remanufactured equipment is all OEM (original equipment manufacturer) certified and comes with the same warranty, quality and support as buying new. We’re a small team with over 14 years’ experience and are part of a larger Sustainable IT Group. This structure means we’re quick and agile. While also offering the deep expertise, global reach and economies of scale that only a larger business can offer. Together, we can take on your toughest IT challenges. Whether you’re searching for hard to find equipment, extending the life of your technology platform or extending your global networking inventory – we’ll find a solution. One that’s more sustainable, resilient and cost effective.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

UiTech

2205 NW Embers Terrace, Cape Coral, Florida, 33993, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

we are a company in the information and technology industry, that take as a great commitment several types of request and problems to solve it professionally and in time. Our goal is to be able to provide solutions and advice to our clients. without limits in the different areas of technology.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cistor-ltd.jpeg
Cistor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitechonline.jpeg
UiTech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cistor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UiTech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cistor in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UiTech in 2025.

Incident History — Cistor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cistor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UiTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UiTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cistor-ltd.jpeg
Cistor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitechonline.jpeg
UiTech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UiTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cistor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, UiTech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cistor company.

In the current year, UiTech company and Cistor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UiTech company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither UiTech company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UiTech company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cistor company nor UiTech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cistor nor UiTech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cistor company nor UiTech company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cistor company employs more people globally than UiTech company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Cistor nor UiTech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cistor nor UiTech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cistor nor UiTech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cistor nor UiTech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cistor nor UiTech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cistor nor UiTech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.