Comparison Overview

Cistor

VS

Trep Data Solutions

Cistor

Third Avenue, Poynton, Cheshire, SK12 1YL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cistor.com

At Cistor, we specialise in both new and authorised remanufactured networking technology. Our remanufactured equipment is all OEM (original equipment manufacturer) certified and comes with the same warranty, quality and support as buying new. We’re a small team with over 14 years’ experience and are part of a larger Sustainable IT Group. This structure means we’re quick and agile. While also offering the deep expertise, global reach and economies of scale that only a larger business can offer. Together, we can take on your toughest IT challenges. Whether you’re searching for hard to find equipment, extending the life of your technology platform or extending your global networking inventory – we’ll find a solution. One that’s more sustainable, resilient and cost effective.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Trep Data Solutions

undefined, Waco, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trepdata.com

We provide complete computer, networking, telephone, telecommunications services to the SMB market (Small to Medium Business) in the Waco and surrounding areas. From desktops and printers to complex networking and Internet solutions. If your business is too small for a full-time networking person, or your main technical person goes on vacation, or you need help with a few projects that require expertise in design and execution, give us a call.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cistor-ltd.jpeg
Cistor
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trep-data-solutions.jpeg
Trep Data Solutions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cistor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trep Data Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cistor in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trep Data Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Cistor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cistor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trep Data Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trep Data Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cistor-ltd.jpeg
Cistor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trep-data-solutions.jpeg
Trep Data Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Trep Data Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cistor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trep Data Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cistor company.

In the current year, Trep Data Solutions company and Cistor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trep Data Solutions company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trep Data Solutions company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trep Data Solutions company nor Cistor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cistor company nor Trep Data Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cistor nor Trep Data Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cistor company nor Trep Data Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cistor company employs more people globally than Trep Data Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Cistor nor Trep Data Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cistor nor Trep Data Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cistor nor Trep Data Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cistor nor Trep Data Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cistor nor Trep Data Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cistor nor Trep Data Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References