Comparison Overview

Cisco Crisis Response

VS

Storage

Cisco Crisis Response

San Jose, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.cisco.com/go/crisisresponse

The Cisco Systems emergency technology response team. We respond to disasters and other catastrophes when requested by Cisco customers. Our team deploys with satellite-based communications kits, radios and the Cisco Network Emergency Response Vehicles (NERV). We also assist first responders, governments, critical infrastructure and NGOs with various activities when we're not doing disaster-related work. Administrators of this page are employees of Cisco Systems, Inc. Opinions expressed here and in any comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, not those of Cisco.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Storage

Bregnerødvej 133D, Birkerød, Birkerød, DK, 3460
Last Update: 2025-11-08
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eetgroup.com

Offering brands such as Ubiquiti, HP and Cisco within Networking, we have a strong proposition to the customers building infrastructure. Ranging from HDD and SSD´s to large NAS solutions from Qnap, Synology and HP Enterprise we carry a complete portfolio for any storage solution. Furthermore KVM infrastructure products and Backup solutions are available in our assortment.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ciscocrisisresponse.jpeg
Cisco Crisis Response
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storage-&-network.jpeg
Storage
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cisco Crisis Response
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Storage
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cisco Crisis Response in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Storage in 2025.

Incident History — Cisco Crisis Response (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco Crisis Response cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Storage (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Storage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ciscocrisisresponse.jpeg
Cisco Crisis Response
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storage-&-network.jpeg
Storage
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Storage company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cisco Crisis Response company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Storage company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cisco Crisis Response company.

In the current year, Storage company and Cisco Crisis Response company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Storage company nor Cisco Crisis Response company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Storage company nor Cisco Crisis Response company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Storage company nor Cisco Crisis Response company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response company nor Storage company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response nor Storage holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Storage company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cisco Crisis Response company.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response nor Storage holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response nor Storage holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response nor Storage holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response nor Storage holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response nor Storage holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response nor Storage holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References