Comparison Overview

Circle World Arts

VS

Syracuse Symphony Orchestra

Circle World Arts

122 Senator Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11220, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.circleworldarts.com

Circle World Arts is a vibrant community of cultural citizens dedicated to sharing artistic traditions across the globe, with support from Yo-Yo Ma's Silk Road Ensemble, the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and the Kennedy Center for Performing Arts. We organize multicultural, interdisciplinary workshops to bring artists, communities, and institutions together across different countries, languages, and traditions. Our workshops are taught by world class faculty for a variety of skill levels, and are hosted in international locations throughout the year. CWA was selected as a "breakthrough idea worth spreading"​ by the TED Residency Incubator and invited to give a TED talk at the NYC headquarters.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Syracuse Symphony Orchestra

411 Montgomery St., Syracuse, NY, 13202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.syracusesymphony.org

The Syracuse Symphony Orchestra quickly evolved from its beginning in 1961 as a community orchestra into a fully professional resident orchestra serving the entire Central and Northern New York State region. Today an ensemble of national acclaim, the Symphony boasts 80 musicians and a conducting staff of international caliber, and performs full-orchestra and chamber ensemble concerts throughout Central and Northern New York, reaching more than 225,000 audience members during its 39-week season. At the conclusion of the 2009-2010 season, the Syracuse Symphony Orchestra will have presented 132 or more concerts—91 full-orchestra concerts and 41 ensemble performances throughout the region. The SSO will have visited 16 counties and 35 cities and towns across New York State.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-world-arts.jpeg
Circle World Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/syracuse-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Syracuse Symphony Orchestra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Circle World Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Syracuse Symphony Orchestra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Circle World Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Syracuse Symphony Orchestra in 2025.

Incident History — Circle World Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Circle World Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Syracuse Symphony Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Syracuse Symphony Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-world-arts.jpeg
Circle World Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/syracuse-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Syracuse Symphony Orchestra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Circle World Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Circle World Arts company.

In the current year, Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company and Circle World Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company nor Circle World Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company nor Circle World Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company nor Circle World Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Circle World Arts company nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Circle World Arts nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Circle World Arts company nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Syracuse Symphony Orchestra company employs more people globally than Circle World Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Circle World Arts nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Circle World Arts nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Circle World Arts nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Circle World Arts nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Circle World Arts nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Circle World Arts nor Syracuse Symphony Orchestra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References