Comparison Overview

Circle of Friends for Mental Health

VS

Mile High Behavioral Healthcare

Circle of Friends for Mental Health

1100 NE Campus Parkway #200, Seattle, WA, 98195, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Circle of Friends for Mental Health, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, exists to give all human beings who face mental health challenges, homelessness or addiction, a fresh chance to find their identity and a reservoir of healing through art programs in visual arts and animation, music, writing and drama. Our programs serve as a natural enduring catalyst to aid people in their recovery. The people we serve have wide-ranging needs, and come from diverse cultural, social and economic backgrounds.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mile High Behavioral Healthcare

4242 Delaware St, Denver, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

HERE THEN. HERE NOW. HERE TOMORROW. Since 1960, our mission is to empower individuals to shape healthy, viable, complete lives. We serve with respect, integrity and authenticity to offer safe, stable care. We advocate for the long-term best interests of those with behavioral health issues and we bring people together for a greater understanding of one another. Founded over 50 years ago as The Mile High Council on Substance Abuse and Mental Health, we're now known as Mile High Behavioral Healthcare to better reflect our integrated, comprehensive care. Providing a seamless continuum of behavioral healthcare to those in need, we offer accessible and affordable care and housing, with focused and diverse programs to address an individual’s life challenges. To date we're proud to say we have served more than 250,000 individuals. We could not have accomplished this without consistently standing by our principles and mission for the benefit of our programs, our clients, our community. Everyone is welcome at MHBHC and from the moment you walk through the door we provide a path for you to become strong, healthy and self-sufficient. At MHBHC you are accepted and nurtured in discovering a sense of purpose and possibility. We look at your whole life, your personality, potential, talents and struggles and offer what you need, in one place, every step of the way. We are here for individuals who are struggling in everyday life. We are here for individuals who need temporary housing. With an empathetic, dedicated and skilled staff, we are committed to personal transformation for the good of the individual and the good of the community. For over 50 years, we have expanded services, broadened programs and continued our work that is life changing.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-of-friends-for-mental-health.jpeg
Circle of Friends for Mental Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mile-high-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Mile High Behavioral Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Circle of Friends for Mental Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mile High Behavioral Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Circle of Friends for Mental Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mile High Behavioral Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Circle of Friends for Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Circle of Friends for Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mile High Behavioral Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mile High Behavioral Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-of-friends-for-mental-health.jpeg
Circle of Friends for Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mile-high-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Mile High Behavioral Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Circle of Friends for Mental Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Circle of Friends for Mental Health company.

In the current year, Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company and Circle of Friends for Mental Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company nor Circle of Friends for Mental Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company nor Circle of Friends for Mental Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company nor Circle of Friends for Mental Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health company nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health company nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mile High Behavioral Healthcare company employs more people globally than Circle of Friends for Mental Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Circle of Friends for Mental Health nor Mile High Behavioral Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N