Comparison Overview

Circle K

VS

Rumah

Circle K

4204, Boul. Industriel, Laval, Québec, CA, H7L 0E3
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Our mission at Circle K is to make our customers' lives a little easier every day. We are part of communities across North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, helping us grow into one of the world’s leading convenience and fuel retail businesses. Our parent company, Alimentation Couche-Tard (“Couche-Tard”), is a leader in the Canadian convenience store industry. Together, we are brightening journeys across more than 14,200 stores in 26 countries worldwide. We’re all about Growing Together. Learn how you can join our team today: https://workwithus.circlek.com. Work with us, and we’ll make it work for you. Find out more at https://www.circlek.com/ or connect with us on Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 41,556
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Rumah

Centro, Balneário Camboriú, Santa Catarina, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fundada em Junho de 2015, a Rumah é uma loja online especializada em artigos de decoração e itens para a casa, entregando seus produtos para o Brasil inteiro. Com um portfólio grande e variado, a Rumah proporciona diversas opções para seus clientes em várias categorias. Das influências clássicas, modernas, sofisticadas às rústicas e despojadas, aliamos a funcionalidade e inovação ao conforto, praticidade e beleza para integrar espaços com mix de produtos bem pensado e sempre atento às novas tendências.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,774
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-k.jpeg
Circle K
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rumah.jpeg
Rumah
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Circle K
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rumah
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Circle K in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rumah in 2025.

Incident History — Circle K (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Circle K cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rumah (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rumah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-k.jpeg
Circle K
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rumah.jpeg
Rumah
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rumah company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Circle K company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Circle K company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rumah company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rumah company and Circle K company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rumah company nor Circle K company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Circle K company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Rumah company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rumah company nor Circle K company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Circle K company nor Rumah company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Circle K nor Rumah holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Circle K company nor Rumah company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Circle K company employs more people globally than Rumah company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Circle K nor Rumah holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Circle K nor Rumah holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Circle K nor Rumah holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Circle K nor Rumah holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Circle K nor Rumah holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Circle K nor Rumah holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H