Comparison Overview

CIPO Software

VS

Binance

CIPO Software

Riverside, California 92507, US, Riverside, California 92507, US
Last Update: 2025-03-19 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

CIPO Software offers a modern Project Management Information System (PMIS) designed to be the ultimate solution for construction owners. Built from the ground up for Owners, by Owners, our cloud-based platform delivers seamless process automation by integrating program and project management into a unified, efficient system. With a focus on streamlining processes, unifying data, and enhancing decision-making, CIPO improves performance throughout the project lifecycle, regardless of project size. Constructing success with advanced customization and cutting-edge technology, CIPO standardizes workflows, forms, and reports, institutionalizing best practices to drive efficiency. Centralized communication and documentation foster transparency and collaboration, ensuring easy access to critical information. Continuously evolving with feedback from our owner customers, CIPO ensures you are always on the latest version without disrupting future upgrades, helping you optimize construction management and stay ahead in the industry.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Binance

undefined, Everywhere, undefined, 0, OO
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 0 and 549

Binance is the world’s leading blockchain ecosystem and cryptocurrency infrastructure provider with a product suite that includes the world's largest digital asset exchange and much more. Trusted by over 200 millions of users worldwide, the Binance platform is dedicated to increasing the freedom of money for users, and features an unmatched portfolio of crypto products and offerings, including: trading and finance, education, data and research, social good, investment and incubation, decentralization and infrastructure solutions, and more. Posts are not directed towards UK users.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,409
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CIPO Software
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/binance.jpeg
Binance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIPO Software
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Binance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIPO Software in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Binance in 2025.

Incident History — CIPO Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIPO Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Binance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CIPO Software
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/binance.jpeg
Binance
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Money Laundering, Tax Evasion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Legal/Diplomatic
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Money Laundering, Tax Evasion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CIPO Software company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Binance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Binance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CIPO Software company has not reported any.

In the current year, Binance company and CIPO Software company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Binance company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CIPO Software company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Binance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CIPO Software company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Binance company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CIPO Software company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CIPO Software company nor Binance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIPO Software nor Binance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Binance company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CIPO Software company.

Binance company employs more people globally than CIPO Software company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither CIPO Software nor Binance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIPO Software nor Binance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIPO Software nor Binance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIPO Software nor Binance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIPO Software nor Binance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIPO Software nor Binance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 001, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 004, 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 006, and earlier unsupported releases IBM Business Automation Workflow is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Deck Mate 2 is distributed with static, hard-coded credentials for the root shell and web user interface, while multiple management services (SSH, HTTP, Telnet, SMB, X11) are enabled by default. If an attacker can reach these interfaces - most often through local or near-local access such as connecting to the USB or Ethernet ports beneath the table - the built-in credentials permit administrative login and full control of the system. Once authenticated, an attacker can access firmware utilities, modify controller software, and establish persistent compromise. Remote attack paths via network, cellular, or telemetry links may exist in specific configurations but generally require additional capabilities or operator error. The vendor reports that USB access has been disabled in current firmware builds.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A potential vulnerability was reported in some Lenovo Tablets that could allow a local authenticated user or application to gain access to sensitive device specific information.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.1.3, under certain circumstances, disclose sensitive user account information (including API keys and hashed passwords) to authenticated users who should not have access to that data. Exposure of API keys or password hashes could lead to account compromise, abuse of API privileges, or offline cracking attempts. CVE-2024-13995 addresses a similar vulnerability with a potentially incomplete fix for the underlying problem in earlier versions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.1.3 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in which an authenticated administrator could leverage the Migrate Server feature to obtain root privileges on the underlying XI host. By abusing the migration workflow, an admin-level attacker could execute actions outside the intended security scope of the application, resulting in full control of the operating system.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X