Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Children's

VS

Beth Israel Lahey Health

Cincinnati Children's

US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Cincinnati Children’s, a nonprofit academic medical center established in 1883, offers services from well-child care to treatment for the most rare and complex conditions. It is the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and trains more than 600 residents and clinical fellows each year. Cincinnati Children’s is a force in pediatric research and offers some of the best research-based education and training programs in the nation. Cincinnati Children’s is proud to be an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating an environment of dignity and respect for all our employees, patients, and families. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, genetic information, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or protected veteran status. EEO/Veteran/Disability

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,163
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Beth Israel Lahey Health

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Beth Israel Lahey Health is a new, integrated system providing patients with better care wherever they are. Care informed by world-class research and education. We are doctors and nurses, technicians and social workers, innovators and educators, and so many others. All with a shared vision for what health care can and should be.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,316
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnatichildrens.jpeg
Cincinnati Children's
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-lahey-health.jpeg
Beth Israel Lahey Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Children's
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Beth Israel Lahey Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Children's in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Lahey Health in 2025.

Incident History — Cincinnati Children's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Children's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Beth Israel Lahey Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Lahey Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnatichildrens.jpeg
Cincinnati Children's
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-lahey-health.jpeg
Beth Israel Lahey Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2014
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Cincinnati Children's company and Beth Israel Lahey Health company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cincinnati Children's company has not reported any.

In the current year, Beth Israel Lahey Health company and Cincinnati Children's company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Beth Israel Lahey Health company nor Cincinnati Children's company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Beth Israel Lahey Health company nor Cincinnati Children's company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Cincinnati Children's company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Children's company nor Beth Israel Lahey Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Children's nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cincinnati Children's company.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company employs more people globally than Cincinnati Children's company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Cincinnati Children's nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Children's nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Children's nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Children's nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Children's nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Children's nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N