Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Opera

VS

Centro Cultural Amanda

Cincinnati Opera

1243 Elm Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

­Fou­n­ded in 1920 and the second oldest opera company in the U.S., Cincinnati Opera presents a thrilling roster of world-class artists and conductors, important company debuts, stunning sets and costumes, and the spectacular Cincin­nati Symphony Orchestra. Today the c­ompany is hailed as Cincinnati's "prime summer arts festival"​ attracting a passionate regional audience as well as opera tourists from throughout the U.S. and Canada.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Centro Cultural Amanda

CL
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Ubicado en plena comuna de Vitacura, Centro Cultural Amanda es una multiplataforma para el desarrollo de las expresiones culturales en nuestro país. Además de funcionar como epicentro de conciertos, fiestas y música en vivo, también dispone de espacios destinados a la gastronomía -Restaurant y Terraza-, teatro, ferias de diseño, eventos corporativos y al desarrollo de talleres artísticos. Todo en un solo lugar!

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-opera.jpeg
Cincinnati Opera
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centro-cultural-amanda.jpeg
Centro Cultural Amanda
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Opera
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centro Cultural Amanda
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Opera in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centro Cultural Amanda in 2025.

Incident History — Cincinnati Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centro Cultural Amanda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centro Cultural Amanda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-opera.jpeg
Cincinnati Opera
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centro-cultural-amanda.jpeg
Centro Cultural Amanda
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Centro Cultural Amanda company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cincinnati Opera company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Centro Cultural Amanda company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cincinnati Opera company.

In the current year, Centro Cultural Amanda company and Cincinnati Opera company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Centro Cultural Amanda company nor Cincinnati Opera company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Centro Cultural Amanda company nor Cincinnati Opera company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Centro Cultural Amanda company nor Cincinnati Opera company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Opera company nor Centro Cultural Amanda company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Opera nor Centro Cultural Amanda holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cincinnati Opera company nor Centro Cultural Amanda company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cincinnati Opera company employs more people globally than Centro Cultural Amanda company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Cincinnati Opera nor Centro Cultural Amanda holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Opera nor Centro Cultural Amanda holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Opera nor Centro Cultural Amanda holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Opera nor Centro Cultural Amanda holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Opera nor Centro Cultural Amanda holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Opera nor Centro Cultural Amanda holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N