Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Observatory

VS

Oklahoma City Museum of Art

Cincinnati Observatory

3489 Observatory Pl, Cincinnati, 45208-2563, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cincinnatiobservatory.org

The mission of the Cincinnati Observatory Center (the Observatory) will be to maintain the integrity and heritage of a historic 19th century observatory while promoting the study and practice of 21st century astronomy and science. Our vision is to be a primary resource in furthering astronomy and science education through programming: For K-12 schools and the public on and off our campus For universities and classes for teacher professional development To promote the rich history of the Observatory To strengthen our connection to allied STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) organizations

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Oklahoma City Museum of Art

415 Couch Drive, Oklahoma City, 73102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.okcmoa.com

The Oklahoma City Museum of Art is one of the leading arts institutions in the region. The Museum presents a dynamic range of exhibitions organized from prestigious museums and collections throughout the world. The Museum’s own diverse collection features highlights from North America, Europe, and Asia, with particular strengths in American art and postwar abstraction. The permanent collection also boasts one of the world’s largest public collections of Dale Chihuly glass, a major collection of photography by Brett Weston, and the definitive museum collection of works by the Washington Color painter Paul Reed. The Museum’s renowned Samuel Roberts Noble Theater screens the finest international, independent, documentary, and classic films. Museum amenities include the Museum Store and the Roof Terrace. The Oklahoma City Museum of Art is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums and is a member of the Association of Art Museum Directors. The Museum serves over 125,000 visitors annually from all fifty states and thirty foreign countries.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-observatory.jpeg
Cincinnati Observatory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oklahoma-city-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oklahoma City Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Observatory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oklahoma City Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Observatory in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oklahoma City Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Cincinnati Observatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Observatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oklahoma City Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oklahoma City Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-observatory.jpeg
Cincinnati Observatory
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oklahoma-city-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oklahoma City Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Oklahoma City Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cincinnati Observatory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oklahoma City Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cincinnati Observatory company.

In the current year, Oklahoma City Museum of Art company and Cincinnati Observatory company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory company nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory company nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oklahoma City Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Cincinnati Observatory company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References