Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Observatory

VS

Bainbridge Art Museum

Cincinnati Observatory

3489 Observatory Pl, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45208-2563, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cincinnatiobservatory.org

The mission of the Cincinnati Observatory Center (the Observatory) will be to maintain the integrity and heritage of a historic 19th century observatory while promoting the study and practice of 21st century astronomy and science. Our vision is to be a primary resource in furthering astronomy and science education through programming: For K-12 schools and the public on and off our campus For universities and classes for teacher professional development To promote the rich history of the Observatory To strengthen our connection to allied STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) organizations

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bainbridge Art Museum

Mailing: P.O. Box 11413, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bainbridgeartmuseum.org

Bainbridge Art Museum is a regional visual arts museum in the planning and design stages. We plan to open in fall 2012. We are an art museum devoted to the art and crafts of our region. We will host exhibits and education programs geared to all ages and interests. The museum will house a permanent art collection, comprised of gifts of art - and promised gifts of art - from regional art collectors, artists, galleries and estates. We will open in our "complete" form in fall 2012, and look forward to adding to the rich cultural mix of Puget Sound.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-observatory.jpeg
Cincinnati Observatory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bainbridge-art-museum.jpeg
Bainbridge Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Observatory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bainbridge Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Observatory in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bainbridge Art Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Cincinnati Observatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Observatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bainbridge Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bainbridge Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-observatory.jpeg
Cincinnati Observatory
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bainbridge-art-museum.jpeg
Bainbridge Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cincinnati Observatory company and Bainbridge Art Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Bainbridge Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cincinnati Observatory company.

In the current year, Bainbridge Art Museum company and Cincinnati Observatory company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bainbridge Art Museum company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bainbridge Art Museum company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bainbridge Art Museum company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory company nor Bainbridge Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Bainbridge Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory company nor Bainbridge Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cincinnati Observatory company employs more people globally than Bainbridge Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Bainbridge Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Bainbridge Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Bainbridge Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Bainbridge Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Bainbridge Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory nor Bainbridge Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References