Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Museum Center

VS

Worcester Art Museum

Cincinnati Museum Center

1301 Western Ave., Cincinnati, OH, US, 45203
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://linktr.ee/cincymuseum

Cincinnati Museum Center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science; regional history; and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences. Originally built as a train station in 1933, Cincinnati Museum Center now houses the Cincinnati History Museum, the Museum of Natural History & Science, the Duke Energy Children's Museum, the Robert D. Lindner Family OMNIMAX Theatre, the Cincinnati History Library and Archives and special exhibition space.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 266
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Worcester Art Museum

55 Salisbury Street, Worcester, 01609, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.worcesterart.org/

The Worcester Art Museum creates transformative programs and exhibitions, drawing on its exceptional collection of art. Dating from 3,000 BC to the present, these works provide the foundation for a focus on audience engagement, connecting visitors of all ages and abilities with inspiring art and demonstrating its enduring relevance to daily life. Creative initiatives— including pioneering collaborative programs with local schools, fresh approaches to exhibition design and in-gallery teaching, and a long history of studio class instruction—offer opportunities for diverse audiences to experience art and learn both from and with artists. Since its founding in 1896, the Worcester Art Museum has assembled a collection of 38,000 objects: from the ancient Near East and Asia, to European and American paintings and sculptures, and continuing with works by contemporary artists from around the world. WAM has a history of making large scale acquisitions, such as its Medieval Chapter House, the Worcester Hunt Mosaic, its 15th-century Spanish ceiling, and the Flemish Last Judgment tapestry. In 2013, the Museum acquired the John Woodman Higgins Armory Collection comprising two thousand arms and armor objects. It continues to commission and present new works, such as 2017’s installation of the interactive Reusable Universes and Organic Concept works by Shi Chieh Huang.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-museum-center.jpeg
Cincinnati Museum Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worcester-art-museum.jpeg
Worcester Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Museum Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Worcester Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Museum Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Worcester Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Cincinnati Museum Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Museum Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Worcester Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Worcester Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-museum-center.jpeg
Cincinnati Museum Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worcester-art-museum.jpeg
Worcester Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Worcester Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cincinnati Museum Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cincinnati Museum Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Worcester Art Museum company has not reported any.

In the current year, Worcester Art Museum company and Cincinnati Museum Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Cincinnati Museum Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Worcester Art Museum company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Worcester Art Museum company nor Cincinnati Museum Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Worcester Art Museum company nor Cincinnati Museum Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center company nor Worcester Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center nor Worcester Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center company nor Worcester Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cincinnati Museum Center company employs more people globally than Worcester Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center nor Worcester Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center nor Worcester Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center nor Worcester Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center nor Worcester Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center nor Worcester Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Museum Center nor Worcester Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References