Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Art Museum

VS

Zoo New England

Cincinnati Art Museum

953 Eden Park Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45206, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Located in scenic Eden Park, the Cincinnati Art Museum features an unparalleled art collection of more than 65,000 works spanning 6,000 years. In addition to displaying its own broad collection, the Art Museum also hosts several national and international traveling exhibitions each year. Visitors can enjoy the exhibitions or participate in the Art Museum’s wide range of art-related programs, activities and special events. General admission is always free for all, plus Art Museum members receive additional benefits. The Art Museum is open six days a week, making greater Cincinnati’s most treasured cultural asset accessible to everyone. The Cincinnati Art Museum is supported by the generosity of individuals and businesses that give annually to ArtsWave. The Ohio Arts Council helped fund the Cincinnati Art Museum with state tax dollars to encourage economic growth, educational excellence and cultural enrichment for all Ohioans. The Cincinnati Art Museum gratefully acknowledges operating support from the City of Cincinnati, as well as our members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 204
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zoo New England

1 Franklin Park Rd, Boston, 02121, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Zoo New England's mission is to inspire people to protect and sustain the natural world for future generations by creating fun and engaging experiences that integrate wildlife and conservation programs, research, and education. Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/A Zoo New England ("Zoo New England"​) is the private, non-profit corporation that operates Franklin Park Zoo in Boston and Stone Zoo in Stoneham, Massachusetts. Zoo New England programming is made possible through earned revenues and state, private, and corporate funding.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 218
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-art-museum.jpeg
Cincinnati Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-new-england.jpeg
Zoo New England
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zoo New England
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Art Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoo New England in 2025.

Incident History — Cincinnati Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zoo New England (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoo New England cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-art-museum.jpeg
Cincinnati Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-new-england.jpeg
Zoo New England
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cincinnati Art Museum company and Zoo New England company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Zoo New England company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cincinnati Art Museum company.

In the current year, Zoo New England company and Cincinnati Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum company nor Zoo New England company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Zoo New England holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum company nor Zoo New England company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Zoo New England company employs more people globally than Cincinnati Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Zoo New England holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Zoo New England holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Zoo New England holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Zoo New England holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Zoo New England holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Zoo New England holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X