Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Art Museum

VS

Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy

Cincinnati Art Museum

953 Eden Park Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45206, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Located in scenic Eden Park, the Cincinnati Art Museum features an unparalleled art collection of more than 65,000 works spanning 6,000 years. In addition to displaying its own broad collection, the Art Museum also hosts several national and international traveling exhibitions each year. Visitors can enjoy the exhibitions or participate in the Art Museum’s wide range of art-related programs, activities and special events. General admission is always free for all, plus Art Museum members receive additional benefits. The Art Museum is open six days a week, making greater Cincinnati’s most treasured cultural asset accessible to everyone. The Cincinnati Art Museum is supported by the generosity of individuals and businesses that give annually to ArtsWave. The Ohio Arts Council helped fund the Cincinnati Art Museum with state tax dollars to encourage economic growth, educational excellence and cultural enrichment for all Ohioans. The Cincinnati Art Museum gratefully acknowledges operating support from the City of Cincinnati, as well as our members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 204
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy

250 S Harbor Blvd, San Pedro, California, 90731, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Our goals over the past 5 years have focused on building a solid foundation on the guest experience, education, community engagement, and a passionate crew that provides the energy to move our mission forward. Our foundation is consistent, interactive, and authentic, ultimately providing the guest with a memorable and emotional experience. We are now focused on the next phase of our growth: transitioning to a national museum. The National Museum of the Surface Navy is a forward-thinking community-oriented museum located aboard the iconic Battleship IOWA at the Port of Los Angeles – our nation’s busiest port. Watch for a major announcement in January 2019! Mission The mission of the Pacific Battleship Center is to celebrate the American spirit through the preservation and interpretation of the Battleship IOWA, to educate the public on the accomplishments and sacrifices of American patriots, and to engage our guests in unique and exciting ways that bring the ship to life by connecting the past with the future. Vision Celebrating the American Spirit by connecting the past with the future. Programs & Services Pacific Battleship Center accomplishes our vision and mission in five ways: 1. Educating the public through interactive experiences and engaging stories. 2. Developing and strengthening relationships with community partners. 3. Developing and maintaining a strong financial base. 4. Providing a positive opportunity for community involvement through educational, event, and volunteer programs. 5. Creating a positive American experience for regional, national, and international audiences.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-art-museum.jpeg
Cincinnati Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy in 2026.

Incident History — Cincinnati Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-art-museum.jpeg
Cincinnati Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uss-iowa-museum.jpeg
Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cincinnati Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cincinnati Art Museum company.

In the current year, Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company and Cincinnati Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum company nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum company nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cincinnati Art Museum company employs more people globally than Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum nor Battleship IOWA Museum | National Museum of the Surface Navy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N