Comparison Overview

CIMB

VS

CTF Services Limited

CIMB

Menara CIMB, Kuala Lumpur Sentral, Kuala Lumpur, MY, 50470
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cimb.com

CIMB Group is a leading ASEAN universal bank, one of the largest Asian investment banks and one of the world's largest Islamic banks. We are headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and offer consumer banking, commercial banking, wholesale banking, Islamic banking, and asset management products and services. As the fifth largest banking group in ASEAN, we have over 36,000 staff in 16 locations across ASEAN, Asia and beyond. CIMB Bank and CIMB Islamic Bank are members of PIDM.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 13,774
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CTF Services Limited

21/F, NCB Innovation Centre, 888 Lai Chi Kok Road Cheung Sha Wan, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ctfs.com.hk

Listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, CTF Services Limited (Hong Kong Stock Code: 659) is a conglomerate with a diversified portfolio of market-leading businesses, predominantly in Hong Kong and the Mainland. The Group’s businesses include toll roads, construction, insurance, logistics and facilities management. Through the Group’s sustainable business model, it is committed to creating more value for all stakeholders and the community.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimbmalaysia.jpeg
CIMB
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ctfservices.jpeg
CTF Services Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIMB
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CTF Services Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIMB in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CTF Services Limited in 2025.

Incident History — CIMB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIMB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CTF Services Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CTF Services Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimbmalaysia.jpeg
CIMB
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ctfservices.jpeg
CTF Services Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CIMB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CTF Services Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CTF Services Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CIMB company.

In the current year, CTF Services Limited company and CIMB company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CTF Services Limited company nor CIMB company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CTF Services Limited company nor CIMB company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CTF Services Limited company nor CIMB company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CIMB company nor CTF Services Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIMB nor CTF Services Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CIMB company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CTF Services Limited company.

CIMB company employs more people globally than CTF Services Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither CIMB nor CTF Services Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIMB nor CTF Services Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIMB nor CTF Services Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIMB nor CTF Services Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIMB nor CTF Services Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIMB nor CTF Services Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References