Comparison Overview

CILIP, the library and information association

VS

ebrary

CILIP, the library and information association

7 Ridgmount Street, London, undefined, WC1E 7AE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CILIP: the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals is the UK’s largest professional association for everyone who has a professional connection to libraries, information, knowledge and data and shares our belief in their power to change lives. We provide professional career support through training and by offering continuous professional development progression.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ebrary

161 E. Evelyn Avenue, Mountain View, 94041, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For the latest company news follow ProQuest, http://www.linkedin.com/company/proquest. ProQuest ebrary is a leading provider of ebooks and research technology for libraries worldwide. Founded in 1999, the company offers more than 450,000 ebooks from more than 500 trusted publishers via flexible models including subscription with the award-winning Academic Complete™, perpetual archive (purchase), patron driven acquisition, and short-term loans. ebrary is currently integrating with EBL - Ebook Library, fellow ebook pioneer, to provide an unparalleled ebook solution, built on more than 24 years of combined experience.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cilip.jpeg
CILIP, the library and information association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebrary.jpeg
ebrary
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CILIP, the library and information association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ebrary
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CILIP, the library and information association in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ebrary in 2025.

Incident History — CILIP, the library and information association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CILIP, the library and information association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ebrary (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ebrary cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cilip.jpeg
CILIP, the library and information association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebrary.jpeg
ebrary
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CILIP, the library and information association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ebrary company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ebrary company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CILIP, the library and information association company.

In the current year, ebrary company and CILIP, the library and information association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ebrary company nor CILIP, the library and information association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ebrary company nor CILIP, the library and information association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ebrary company nor CILIP, the library and information association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association company nor ebrary company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association nor ebrary holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association company nor ebrary company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CILIP, the library and information association company employs more people globally than ebrary company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association nor ebrary holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association nor ebrary holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association nor ebrary holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association nor ebrary holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association nor ebrary holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CILIP, the library and information association nor ebrary holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.