Comparison Overview

Cigna Healthcare

VS

University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust

Cigna Healthcare

900 Cottage Grove Road, Bloomfield, CT, US, 06002
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

We are a health benefits provider that advocates for better health through every stage of life. We guide our customers through the health care system, empowering them with the information and insight they need to improve their health and vitality.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 29,394
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust

Marlborough Street Bristol, England, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (UHBW). One of the largest acute Trusts in the country, bringing together a combined workforce of over 13,000 staff and over 100 different clinical services across 10 different sites, serving a core population of more than 500,000 people across South West England. The Trust has many and varied career opportunities for you to choose from. UHBW has been rated by the CQC as ‘Good’ overall and our staff are proud to deliver excellent care to the people of Bristol, Weston and beyond. As a forward-thinking multi-award winning Trust and a digital exemplar committed to improving patient care, our world-leading research and innovations are having a positive local and global impact. Our hospitals are spread across Bristol and Weston-super-Mare, join us and you can enjoy the very best of both worlds; city living within a stone’s throw of the countryside or beside the seaside, both with easy access to all that the South West has to offer. UHBW is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children, young people and vulnerable adults. As an equal opportunities employer actively working towards a diverse workforce we aim to recruit and retain a workforce which represents the rich diversity of the local population at all levels and are committed to designing our services around the needs of individual patients and those around them. Anonymous information will be used from your application in order to ensure we’re meeting our pledge. With strong links to the University of Bristol and University of West of England we are the major medical research and training centre in the region, using findings to continually improve our patient care and attracting the highest caliber clinical staff from across the UK. Follow our page and become part of our story.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cignahealthcare.jpeg
Cigna Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-hospitals-bristol-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cigna Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cigna Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust in 2025.

Incident History — Cigna Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cigna Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cignahealthcare.jpeg
Cigna Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2012
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2008
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-hospitals-bristol-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cigna Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cigna Healthcare company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company has not reported any.

In the current year, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company and Cigna Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company nor Cigna Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Cigna Healthcare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company nor Cigna Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cigna Healthcare company nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cigna Healthcare nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cigna Healthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company.

Cigna Healthcare company employs more people globally than University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Cigna Healthcare nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cigna Healthcare nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cigna Healthcare nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cigna Healthcare nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cigna Healthcare nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cigna Healthcare nor University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H