Comparison Overview

CICAYDA

VS

Capital Legal Services

CICAYDA

110 4th Avenue S, Franklin, Tennessee, 37064, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Cicayda provides intelligent discovery, a complete ecosystem for legal professionals called iDiscovery®. We leverage people, innovation and technology to support the practice of law and its professionals in discovery, review, production, and compliance. It’s the next generation of Discovery that includes the latest capabilities and technical legal expertise; Cicayda’s unique approach to the discovery process that drives greater efficiency, accuracy and lower costs for clients. Our Solutions Include: - Legal Hold Automation – Fermata - Early Case Strategy - Social Media Discovery - ESI Processing Strategy & Protocol - Managed Document Review - Matter Analytics, Review and Production

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Capital Legal Services

Marine Plaza, 10th floor 62, Uzeyir Hajibeyli Street, Baku, AZ1010, AZ
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CLS is an independent law firm that is widely recognized as one of the leading law firms in Azerbaijan, and provides full spectrum of legal and tax services to local and international clients in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, antitrust and competition, banking and finance, foreign investment, public private partnership, privatization, restructuring and insolvency, corporate and commercial law, intellectual property and dispute resolution. Our clients include global investment and commercial banks, international financial institutions, funds, major foreign corporates, state-owned companies, diversified holdings, industrial companies, joint ventures, and prominent local companies. As a leading consultancy firm engaged in cross-border transactions, we cooperate and maintain close relationships with a number of leading regional and international law and consultancy firms and are a preferred Azerbaijani counsel for some of the Magic Circle, and City law firms.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cicayda.jpeg
CICAYDA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CICAYDA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capital Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CICAYDA in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Legal Services in 2025.

Incident History — CICAYDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CICAYDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capital Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cicayda.jpeg
CICAYDA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-legal-services.jpeg
Capital Legal Services
Incidents

FAQ

Capital Legal Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CICAYDA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Capital Legal Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CICAYDA company.

In the current year, Capital Legal Services company and CICAYDA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capital Legal Services company nor CICAYDA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Capital Legal Services company nor CICAYDA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capital Legal Services company nor CICAYDA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CICAYDA company nor Capital Legal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CICAYDA nor Capital Legal Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CICAYDA company nor Capital Legal Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Capital Legal Services company employs more people globally than CICAYDA company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither CICAYDA nor Capital Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CICAYDA nor Capital Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CICAYDA nor Capital Legal Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CICAYDA nor Capital Legal Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CICAYDA nor Capital Legal Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CICAYDA nor Capital Legal Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X