Comparison Overview

CIC

VS

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

CIC

6, Avenue de Provence, None, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75009
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

CIC is the fourth largest banking group in France, consisting of seven regional banks which operate across France through a network of 1,844 branches employing 24,000 staff. CIC's customer base includes 2.7 million retail clients. One in eleven self-employed professionals is a CIC group client and nearly one in three companies banks with CIC Group.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

Jl. HR. Rasuna Said Blok C No. 10, Karet Setiabudi, JAKARTA, DKI Jakarta, ID, 12940
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk (BEI: BDMN) didirikan pada tahun 1956. Per 31 Desember 2024, Danamon mengelola aset konsolidasian sebesar Rp242 triliun dengan anak perusahannya, Adira Finance. Dalam hal kepemilikan saham, 92,47% saham Danamon dimiliki oleh MUFG, dan 7,53% lainnya dimiliki oleh publik. Dalam melayani nasabah dari semua lini bisnis yaitu Retail, Usaha Kecil dan Menengah, serta Korporasi, Danamon didukung oleh 865* kantor cabang konvensional dan unit Syariah, serta kantor cabang dan kantor perwakilan grup perusahaan Danamon di Indonesia. Sebagai anak perusahaan dari MUFG yang merupakan salah satu grup jasa keuangan terbesar di dunia, Danamon didukung oleh jaringan global MUFG dan bank mitranya: Krungsri Bank di Thailand, Security Bank di Filipina, dan VietinBank di Vietnam. Danamon juga diperkuat oleh jaringan lokal dari grup perusahaannya yaitu Adira Finance, Home Credit Indonesia, Mandala Finance, dan Zurich Asuransi Indonesia, serta mitra strategisnya. Bersama MUFG, grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya, Danamon berkomitmen untuk terus bertransformasi sebagai Satu Grup Finansial, guna menjadi mitra keuangan terpercaya yang berorientasi pada pelanggan dan selalu berinovasi, demi memenuhi kebutuhan pemegang saham, nasabah, karyawan, dan regulator dengan menghadirkan solusi finansial menyeluruh agar dapat tumbuh bersama. Danamon dan grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya juga menyadari pentingnya aspek keberlanjutan sebagai bagian tak terpisahkan dari pertumbuhan dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Selain itu, dalam menjalankan bisnis serta untuk mencapai tujuan sesuai dengan visi dan misinya, Danamon menjunjung tinggi nilai perusahaan “BISA”, yang harus diterapkan oleh seluruh karyawan, manajemen, direksi, dan komisaris Danamon. Nilai-nilai tersebut meliputi Berkolaborasi, Intergritas, Sigap Melayani, dan Adaptif.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cic.jpeg
CIC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-danamon-indonesia.jpeg
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIC in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk in 2025.

Incident History — CIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cic.jpeg
CIC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-danamon-indonesia.jpeg
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CIC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CIC company.

In the current year, PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company and CIC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company nor CIC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company nor CIC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company nor CIC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CIC company nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIC nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CIC company nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CIC company employs more people globally than PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither CIC nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIC nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIC nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIC nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIC nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIC nor PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H