Comparison Overview

CIB Egypt

VS

Union Bank of India

CIB Egypt

21/23 Charles De Gaulle Giza. P.O. Box 2430 Cairo, Egypt., Giza, undefined, 11213, EG
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Commercial International Bank was established in 1975 as a joint venture between the National Bank of Egypt (NBE, 51%) and the Chase Manhattan Bank (49%) under the name "Chase National Bank of Egypt”. Following Chase's decision to divest its equity stake in 1987, NBE increased its shareholding to 99.9%, changing the Bank’s name to Commercial International Bank (Egypt) S.A.E. NBE’s stake gradually decreased through several public offerings till reaching 18.7%. In 2006, a Consortium led by Ripplewood Holdings acquired NBE stake. In July 2009, Actis, a leading emerging markets private equity firm, invested US$ 244 million to get shares in CIB, acquiring hence 50% of the Ripplewood Holdings Consortium’s stake. Five months later, Ripplewood sold its remaining 4.7% stake over the open market, marking the successful transition of strategic partnership to be with Actis, who then became CIB’s largest shareholder with a 9.1% stake. In March 2014,Actis sold a portion of its holding, representing 2.6% of the Bank’s total outstanding shares, in the open market to a group of international investors. In May 2014, Actis, successfully realised its investment in CIB and sold its remaining 6.5% to Subsidiaries wholly owned by Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd “Fairfax”. CIB is Egypt’s leading private sector bank, offering a broad range of financial products and services to its customers, including enterprises of all sizes, institutions, households and high-net worth individuals. CIB strives to provide superior financial solutions to meet all customers’ needs. Having the strongest brand equity rightfully places CIB as the bank of choice for over 500 of Egypt’s largest corporations. CIB shows tremendous potential within the bourgeoning Retail and SME Banking markets. Through its superior management, high-operating standards, corporate governance best practices and training programs,CIB has succeeded in becoming the most profitable commercial bank operating in Egypt for more than 40 years.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15,324
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Union Bank of India

Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Union Bank of India is one of the leading public sector banks of the country. The Bank is a listed entity, and the Government of India holds 74.76 percent in Bank’s total paid-up capital. The Bank, having its headquarters at Mumbai (India), was registered on November 11, 1919 as a limited company. On 1st April 2020, Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank were amalgamated into Union Bank of India. Our Bank has a network of 8,400+ domestic branches, 9,300+ ATMs, 74,500+ employees and 19,500+ Business Correspondents . The Bank has expanded its presence across all States and Union Territories. The Bank’s total business as of 30th June 2024 stood at ₹ 21,36,405 crore, comprising ₹ 12,24,191 crore of deposits and ₹ 9,12,214 crore of advances. The Bank also has 2 overseas branches at Dubai International Financial Centre (UAE) & Sydney (Australia); 1 banking subsidiary at London (UK); 1 banking joint venture in Malaysia; 4 para-banking subsidiaries (domestic); 2 joint ventures and 1 associate - Chaitanya Godavari Gramin Bank. Union Bank of India is the first large public sector bank in the country to have implemented 100% core banking solution. The Bank has received several awards and recognition for its prowess in technology, digital banking, financial inclusion, MSME and development of human resources. Do not share your Mobile Number, Account Details, Card details or any other Personal Detail publicly on social media. Avoid clicking unknown links or downloading APKs from emails or messages. Stay alert and cyber-safe

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 19,933
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unionbankofindia.jpeg
Union Bank of India
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIB Egypt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Union Bank of India
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIB Egypt in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union Bank of India in 2025.

Incident History — CIB Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIB Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Union Bank of India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Union Bank of India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unionbankofindia.jpeg
Union Bank of India
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Union Bank of India company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CIB Egypt company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Union Bank of India company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CIB Egypt company.

In the current year, Union Bank of India company and CIB Egypt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Union Bank of India company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Union Bank of India company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Union Bank of India company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor Union Bank of India company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt nor Union Bank of India holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor Union Bank of India company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Union Bank of India company employs more people globally than CIB Egypt company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither CIB Egypt nor Union Bank of India holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor Union Bank of India holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor Union Bank of India holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor Union Bank of India holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor Union Bank of India holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor Union Bank of India holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N