Comparison Overview

CIB Egypt

VS

IDBI Bank

CIB Egypt

21/23 Charles De Gaulle Giza. P.O. Box 2430 Cairo, Egypt., Giza, undefined, 11213, EG
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Commercial International Bank was established in 1975 as a joint venture between the National Bank of Egypt (NBE, 51%) and the Chase Manhattan Bank (49%) under the name "Chase National Bank of Egypt”. Following Chase's decision to divest its equity stake in 1987, NBE increased its shareholding to 99.9%, changing the Bank’s name to Commercial International Bank (Egypt) S.A.E. NBE’s stake gradually decreased through several public offerings till reaching 18.7%. In 2006, a Consortium led by Ripplewood Holdings acquired NBE stake. In July 2009, Actis, a leading emerging markets private equity firm, invested US$ 244 million to get shares in CIB, acquiring hence 50% of the Ripplewood Holdings Consortium’s stake. Five months later, Ripplewood sold its remaining 4.7% stake over the open market, marking the successful transition of strategic partnership to be with Actis, who then became CIB’s largest shareholder with a 9.1% stake. In March 2014,Actis sold a portion of its holding, representing 2.6% of the Bank’s total outstanding shares, in the open market to a group of international investors. In May 2014, Actis, successfully realised its investment in CIB and sold its remaining 6.5% to Subsidiaries wholly owned by Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd “Fairfax”. CIB is Egypt’s leading private sector bank, offering a broad range of financial products and services to its customers, including enterprises of all sizes, institutions, households and high-net worth individuals. CIB strives to provide superior financial solutions to meet all customers’ needs. Having the strongest brand equity rightfully places CIB as the bank of choice for over 500 of Egypt’s largest corporations. CIB shows tremendous potential within the bourgeoning Retail and SME Banking markets. Through its superior management, high-operating standards, corporate governance best practices and training programs,CIB has succeeded in becoming the most profitable commercial bank operating in Egypt for more than 40 years.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15,324
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IDBI Bank

IDBI Tower, WTC Complex,, Cuffe Parade, Colaba., Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400005
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to IDBI Bank's LinkedIn page! We are a leading bank in India, with a rich legacy. At IDBI Bank, we believe in empowering our customers by providing them with a wide range of banking products and services to meet their financial needs. Whether you are an individual, a small business owner, or a large corporation, we have tailored solutions that are designed to help you achieve your financial goals. Our product portfolio includes savings accounts, current accounts, fixed deposits, loans, credit cards, and many more. We offer digital banking services such as Internet banking, mobile banking, and e-wallets to make banking more convenient and accessible for our customers. At IDBI Bank, we strongly believe in creating a culture of innovation, learning, and growth for our employees. We provide a supportive work environment that encourages our employees to explore their potential and develop new skills. Follow our LinkedIn page to stay updated on our latest news, events, and insights. We are dedicated to serving our customers and communities, and we look forward to connecting with you on LinkedIn. Thank you for connecting with IDBI Bank!

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 17,646
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idbi-bank.jpeg
IDBI Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIB Egypt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IDBI Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIB Egypt in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDBI Bank in 2025.

Incident History — CIB Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIB Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IDBI Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDBI Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idbi-bank.jpeg
IDBI Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IDBI Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CIB Egypt company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IDBI Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CIB Egypt company.

In the current year, IDBI Bank company and CIB Egypt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IDBI Bank company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IDBI Bank company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IDBI Bank company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor IDBI Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt nor IDBI Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor IDBI Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IDBI Bank company employs more people globally than CIB Egypt company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither CIB Egypt nor IDBI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor IDBI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor IDBI Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor IDBI Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor IDBI Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor IDBI Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N