Comparison Overview

CIB Egypt

VS

ICICI Bank

CIB Egypt

21/23 Charles De Gaulle Giza. P.O. Box 2430 Cairo, Egypt., Giza, undefined, 11213, EG
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Commercial International Bank was established in 1975 as a joint venture between the National Bank of Egypt (NBE, 51%) and the Chase Manhattan Bank (49%) under the name "Chase National Bank of Egypt”. Following Chase's decision to divest its equity stake in 1987, NBE increased its shareholding to 99.9%, changing the Bank’s name to Commercial International Bank (Egypt) S.A.E. NBE’s stake gradually decreased through several public offerings till reaching 18.7%. In 2006, a Consortium led by Ripplewood Holdings acquired NBE stake. In July 2009, Actis, a leading emerging markets private equity firm, invested US$ 244 million to get shares in CIB, acquiring hence 50% of the Ripplewood Holdings Consortium’s stake. Five months later, Ripplewood sold its remaining 4.7% stake over the open market, marking the successful transition of strategic partnership to be with Actis, who then became CIB’s largest shareholder with a 9.1% stake. In March 2014,Actis sold a portion of its holding, representing 2.6% of the Bank’s total outstanding shares, in the open market to a group of international investors. In May 2014, Actis, successfully realised its investment in CIB and sold its remaining 6.5% to Subsidiaries wholly owned by Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd “Fairfax”. CIB is Egypt’s leading private sector bank, offering a broad range of financial products and services to its customers, including enterprises of all sizes, institutions, households and high-net worth individuals. CIB strives to provide superior financial solutions to meet all customers’ needs. Having the strongest brand equity rightfully places CIB as the bank of choice for over 500 of Egypt’s largest corporations. CIB shows tremendous potential within the bourgeoning Retail and SME Banking markets. Through its superior management, high-operating standards, corporate governance best practices and training programs,CIB has succeeded in becoming the most profitable commercial bank operating in Egypt for more than 40 years.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15,324
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ICICI Bank

ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai , Maharashtra, 400 051, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

ICICI Bank is one of India’s leading private sector banks, offering a wide range of banking products and services to corporate, Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) and individual customers across the country. The Bank offers multi-channel touch points including branches, ATMs, mobile banking, internet banking, and phone banking. The Bank has a network of 6,742 branches and 16,277 ATMs and cash recycling machines across India, as at December 31, 2024. For any assistance on products and services, please call ICICI Bank’s customer care number 1800 1080. Disclaimer: The content herein is only for information and does not amount to an offer, invitation or solicitation to buy or sell, and is not intended to create any rights or obligations. It is also not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or would subject ICICI Bank Limited (“ICICI Bank”) or its affiliate(s) to any licensing or registration requirements. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute advice or opinion; please obtain professional advice before relying on any information contained herein. ICICI Bank disclaims any liability with respect to accuracy of information or any error or omission or any loss or damage incurred by anyone in reliance on the contents herein.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 164,277
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIB Egypt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICICI Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIB Egypt in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICICI Bank in 2025.

Incident History — CIB Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIB Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICICI Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICICI Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: ATM Network Processing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ICICI Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CIB Egypt company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ICICI Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CIB Egypt company has not reported any.

In the current year, ICICI Bank company and CIB Egypt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ICICI Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CIB Egypt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor ICICI Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt nor ICICI Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor ICICI Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ICICI Bank company employs more people globally than CIB Egypt company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither CIB Egypt nor ICICI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor ICICI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor ICICI Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor ICICI Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor ICICI Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIB Egypt nor ICICI Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N