Comparison Overview

Chuck Douglas Photography

VS

Times To Remember

Chuck Douglas Photography

undefined, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 3FB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

I am a freelance photographer based in London and Hampshire specialising in creative marketing imagery, contemporary corporate portraiture, commercial stills and events reportage. I am friendly, professional and always dedicated to delivering all the shots that you will need! I have worked with a wide array of brands and clients from a variety of industries including; BBC, Dunlop, EY, Huawei, Intu, Jungle Studios, Limelight Sports, Metro Bank, Orient Capital, Reignwood Group, Sberbank, Sunreef Yachts and Wentworth Club to name but a few!

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Times To Remember

Avenida Menéndez Pelayo 37/4 Centro, Madrid, 28009, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-13

José Bascón empezó su carrera profesional hace 10 años en Londres donde abrió su primer estudio. Su estilo es una mezcla entre documental artístico y juego fotográfico, siempre buscando esos momentos únicos que pasan desapercibidos para la mayoría de la gente. Esta mezcla, conjuntamente con influencias del mundo de la moda, del cine y de la publicidad, definen su estilo y elevan el reportaje social a la categoría de arte.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chuck-douglas-photography.jpeg
Chuck Douglas Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/times-to-remember.jpeg
Times To Remember
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chuck Douglas Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Times To Remember
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chuck Douglas Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Times To Remember in 2025.

Incident History — Chuck Douglas Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chuck Douglas Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Times To Remember (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Times To Remember cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chuck-douglas-photography.jpeg
Chuck Douglas Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/times-to-remember.jpeg
Times To Remember
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Times To Remember company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chuck Douglas Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Times To Remember company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chuck Douglas Photography company.

In the current year, Times To Remember company and Chuck Douglas Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Times To Remember company nor Chuck Douglas Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Times To Remember company nor Chuck Douglas Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Times To Remember company nor Chuck Douglas Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography company nor Times To Remember company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography nor Times To Remember holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography company nor Times To Remember company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Times To Remember company employs more people globally than Chuck Douglas Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography nor Times To Remember holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography nor Times To Remember holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography nor Times To Remember holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography nor Times To Remember holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography nor Times To Remember holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chuck Douglas Photography nor Times To Remember holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N