Comparison Overview

Chrysler Museum of Art

VS

The Dayton Art Institute

Chrysler Museum of Art

One Memorial Place, Norfolk, VA, US, 23510
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1939 as the Norfolk Museum of Arts and Sciences, the Chrysler Museum of Art combines one of America's great fine arts museums, two significant historic houses and a Glass Studio, the only one of its kind on the East Coast. In addition to maintaining a distinguished permanent collection of over 30,000 objects spanning nearly 5,000 years of history, the Chrysler Museum offers a comprehensive program of changing exhibitions and education activities for visitors of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Dayton Art Institute

456 Belmonte Park North, Dayton, Ohio 45405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Dayton Art Institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all. Founded in 1919, The Dayton Art Institute is one of the region’s premier fine arts museums. In addition to exhibiting outstanding special exhibitions and impressive collections of art from throughout the world, the museum is renowned for education programming that includes an array of offerings for diverse audiences.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chrysler-museum-of-art.jpeg
Chrysler Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dayton-art-institute.jpeg
The Dayton Art Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chrysler Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Dayton Art Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chrysler Museum of Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Dayton Art Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Chrysler Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chrysler Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Dayton Art Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Dayton Art Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chrysler-museum-of-art.jpeg
Chrysler Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dayton-art-institute.jpeg
The Dayton Art Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chrysler Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Dayton Art Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Dayton Art Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chrysler Museum of Art company.

In the current year, The Dayton Art Institute company and Chrysler Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor Chrysler Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor Chrysler Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor Chrysler Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor The Dayton Art Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art nor The Dayton Art Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor The Dayton Art Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chrysler Museum of Art company employs more people globally than The Dayton Art Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art nor The Dayton Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art nor The Dayton Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art nor The Dayton Art Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art nor The Dayton Art Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art nor The Dayton Art Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art nor The Dayton Art Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X