Comparison Overview

CHRISTUS Health

VS

Einstein Hospital Israelita

CHRISTUS Health

919 Hidden Ridge , Irving, 75007, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

CHRISTUS Health is a Catholic not-for-profit health care system comprising more than 600 centers, including long-term care facilities, community hospitals, walk-in clinics and health ministries. We are a community of 50,000 Associates, with over 15,000 physicians providing personalized care. Our ministries extend to Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico and Arkansas, and throughout the Americas to Chile, Colombia and Mexico. We continue to expand into new communities each year, adding more physicians and more services and bringing care closer to more people. Sponsored by the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word in Houston and San Antonio and the Sisters of the Holy Family of Nazareth, our mission is to extend the healing ministry of Jesus Christ to every individual we serve.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,417
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Einstein Hospital Israelita

Avenida Albert Einstein 627, São Paulo, SP, BR, 05652-000
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849

O nascimento da Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Albert Einstein, na década de 50, resultou do compromisso da comunidade judaica em oferecer à população brasileira uma referência em qualidade da prática médica. Mas a Sociedade queria ir além da simples construção de um hospital. E assim foi feito, construído com recursos provenientes de doações e do trabalho de um grupo de pessoas dedicadas, o Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein foi inaugurado em 1971. A partir de então, tornou-se referência em tratamentos com tecnologia de ponta, atendimento humanizado e expandiu suas fronteiras com ações de responsabilidade social e atividades de ensino e pesquisa. Hoje, a Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Albert Einstein está à frente de projetos importantes, que mostram como a parceria público-privada pode render frutos para a comunidade. Abrigadas no Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, as atividades de educação e pesquisa são o motor de inovação que não se restringem aos pacientes do Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein e englobam cursos técnicos, de graduação e de pós-graduação, treinamentos sofisticados e pesquisas clínica e experimental. O Einstein é hoje um sistema de saúde. Nossas sementes se espalham em diversas frentes e endereços, multiplicando frutos em benefício dos pacientes, da sociedade e do Sistema Público de Saúde.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 39,901
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christus-health.jpeg
CHRISTUS Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/einstein-hospital-israelita.jpeg
Einstein Hospital Israelita
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CHRISTUS Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Einstein Hospital Israelita
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHRISTUS Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Einstein Hospital Israelita in 2026.

Incident History — CHRISTUS Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHRISTUS Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Einstein Hospital Israelita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Einstein Hospital Israelita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christus-health.jpeg
CHRISTUS Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/einstein-hospital-israelita.jpeg
Einstein Hospital Israelita
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Einstein Hospital Israelita company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CHRISTUS Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Einstein Hospital Israelita company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CHRISTUS Health company.

In the current year, Einstein Hospital Israelita company and CHRISTUS Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Einstein Hospital Israelita company nor CHRISTUS Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Einstein Hospital Israelita company nor CHRISTUS Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Einstein Hospital Israelita company nor CHRISTUS Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CHRISTUS Health company nor Einstein Hospital Israelita company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CHRISTUS Health nor Einstein Hospital Israelita holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Einstein Hospital Israelita company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CHRISTUS Health company.

Einstein Hospital Israelita company employs more people globally than CHRISTUS Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither CHRISTUS Health nor Einstein Hospital Israelita holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CHRISTUS Health nor Einstein Hospital Israelita holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CHRISTUS Health nor Einstein Hospital Israelita holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CHRISTUS Health nor Einstein Hospital Israelita holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CHRISTUS Health nor Einstein Hospital Israelita holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CHRISTUS Health nor Einstein Hospital Israelita holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N