Comparison Overview

Pendleton Law Team

VS

RLK Solicitors

Pendleton Law Team

1506 Staples Mill Rd., Richmond, Virginia, 23230, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Pendleton Law Team is a woman-owned, minority-owned family business offering the best legal value for people from any social financial background. Our proven process is designed to get results for our clients. Awarded Top Workplace designation by the Richmond Times Dispatch in 2021, 2022, and 2023 and a finalist for Best Law Firm in 2021. We are The Heavy Hitters®.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RLK Solicitors

26 Calthorpe Road, Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 1RP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

RLK are a friendly team of legal experts, offering a wide range of services to our clients. Conveyancing, Litigation, Wills and Probate, Family and Divorce, Business Interruption. Fundamental to our success is the strong relationships we build with our clients, resulting in a strong reputation in the local area and throughout the UK. The quality of service and advice we provide comes from a deep understanding of our service areas, strengthened by our experienced team who continuously strive to stay ahead of market trends and current news. We can support you and your business by providing advice and consultancy on: Private Client: Wills and Trusts Probate and Estate Administration Lasting Powers of Attorney Deputyship Conveyancing: Property Management Residential Commercial Litigation: Civil and Commercial Litigation Insolvency Contested Probate Insurance Business Interruption Insurance Claims Matrimonial and Family: Divorce Separation Financial Settlements Dissolution Contact orders Non-molestation orders Arrangement for children Domestic violence Injunctions Pre-nuptial agreements Visit our website for the latest news and updates.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christina-pendleton-associates.jpeg
Pendleton Law Team
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubric-lois-king-solicitors.jpeg
RLK Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pendleton Law Team
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RLK Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pendleton Law Team in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RLK Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Pendleton Law Team (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pendleton Law Team cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RLK Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RLK Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christina-pendleton-associates.jpeg
Pendleton Law Team
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubric-lois-king-solicitors.jpeg
RLK Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pendleton Law Team company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RLK Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RLK Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pendleton Law Team company.

In the current year, RLK Solicitors company and Pendleton Law Team company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RLK Solicitors company nor Pendleton Law Team company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RLK Solicitors company nor Pendleton Law Team company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RLK Solicitors company nor Pendleton Law Team company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pendleton Law Team company nor RLK Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pendleton Law Team nor RLK Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pendleton Law Team company nor RLK Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pendleton Law Team company employs more people globally than RLK Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pendleton Law Team nor RLK Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pendleton Law Team nor RLK Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pendleton Law Team nor RLK Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pendleton Law Team nor RLK Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pendleton Law Team nor RLK Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pendleton Law Team nor RLK Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X