Comparison Overview

Christian Horizons

VS

ONCE

Christian Horizons

26 Peppler St., Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 3C4, CA
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Christian Horizons is committed to nurturing communities of belonging, both in Canada and around the world, where everyone can use their gifts. From supporting people who experience disabilities in Canada, to giving children in Ethiopia the chance to overcome a life of poverty, Christian Horizons is there. Christian Horizons is a non-profit, faith-based charitable organization. Our purpose is to contribute to the quality of life of people who experience disabilities by addressing their emotional, intellectual, social, physical and spiritual needs. With over 3,500 employees, Christian Horizons serves people with developmental disabilities in more than 300 locations in Ontario and Saskatchewan. We seek employees with the skills, experience and character to deliver effective supports to people who experience disabilities. Vision: People who experience disabilities belong to communities in which their God-given gifts are valued and respected. Mission: As an expression of Christian faith, we work together with people who experience disabilities to accomplish their goals and nurture communities where everybody belongs. Values: We will honour God and value people in all we do and with all our resources.

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ONCE

Calle La Coruโˆšยฑa 18 Madrid, Madrid 28020, ES
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

En ONCE trabajamos por la autonomโˆšโ‰ a y la inclusiโˆšโ‰ฅn de las personas ciegas, con discapacidad visual o de otro tipo. Educaciโˆšโ‰ฅn, empleo y ayudas a su servicio. Show more Show less

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christian-horizons.jpeg
Christian Horizons
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/once.jpeg
ONCE
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Christian Horizons
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ONCE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Christian Horizons in 2025.

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ONCE in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Christian Horizons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Christian Horizons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” ONCE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ONCE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christian-horizons.jpeg
Christian Horizons
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/once.jpeg
ONCE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Christian Horizons company and ONCE company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ONCE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Christian Horizons company.

In the current year, ONCE company and Christian Horizons company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ONCE company nor Christian Horizons company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ONCE company nor Christian Horizons company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ONCE company nor Christian Horizons company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Christian Horizons company nor ONCE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Christian Horizons company nor ONCE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Christian Horizons company employs more people globally than ONCE company, reflecting its scale as a Civic and Social Organizations.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X