Comparison Overview

CFLEGAL, PC

VS

Wetswinkel Nijmegen

CFLEGAL, PC

302 E COURT ST, Flint, Michigan, 48502, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

at CFlegal, PC., we proudly represent the rights of individuals facing a wide range of legal matters. Whether you are facing a complex legal matter related to business law, construction law, criminal defense, DUI, elder law, probate law, estate planning, or real estate litigation, we are here for you when you need us most. When you choose to retain the unmatched representation of our Flint attorneys, you can be confident that you have made the right choice. Our legal team will personally handle your case from start to finish. Unlike other law firms, we will not pass you off to a paralegal nor will we treat you as just another case number. You will work one-on-one with our extensively experienced legal professionals every step of the way. We will tirelessly pursue the most favorable case outcome possible by exhausting our legal resources. Do not navigate through the complexities of the legal system without our support. We can help you achieve your goals in a timely and effective manner by utilizing personalized legal solutions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wetswinkel Nijmegen

Tweede Oude Heselaan 386, Nijmegen, 6542, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Stichting Wetswinkel Nijmegen is een vrijwilligersorganisatie die aan iedereen met een juridisch probleem advies geeft. De rechtswinkel staat al sinds 1972 klaar om kostenloos advies te geven aan wie daarom vraagt. Wij zijn aangesloten bij Rechtswinkel Overleg Zuid-Oost Nederland en het Landelijk Studenten Rechtsbureau. De Wetswinkel bestaat uit ongeveer 25 rechtenstudenten. De studenten hebben een bepaald aantal vakken gehaald, wat garant staat voor een goede juridische basiskennis. Zij vinden het belangrijk dat ze mensen kunnen helpen en tevens doen zij op deze manier ervaring in de praktijk op.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christenson-&-fiederlein-pc.jpeg
CFLEGAL, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wetswinkel-nijmegen.jpeg
Wetswinkel Nijmegen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CFLEGAL, PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wetswinkel Nijmegen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CFLEGAL, PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wetswinkel Nijmegen in 2025.

Incident History — CFLEGAL, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CFLEGAL, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wetswinkel Nijmegen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wetswinkel Nijmegen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christenson-&-fiederlein-pc.jpeg
CFLEGAL, PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wetswinkel-nijmegen.jpeg
Wetswinkel Nijmegen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CFLEGAL, PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wetswinkel Nijmegen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wetswinkel Nijmegen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CFLEGAL, PC company.

In the current year, Wetswinkel Nijmegen company and CFLEGAL, PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wetswinkel Nijmegen company nor CFLEGAL, PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wetswinkel Nijmegen company nor CFLEGAL, PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wetswinkel Nijmegen company nor CFLEGAL, PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC company nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC company nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wetswinkel Nijmegen company employs more people globally than CFLEGAL, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CFLEGAL, PC nor Wetswinkel Nijmegen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X