Comparison Overview

Chris Pollard Creative

VS

CottageArts.net, LLC

Chris Pollard Creative

Holbeach Drove Gate, Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE12 0PX, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Based in London UK and specialising in fashion, working on a large range of projects with an ever growing list of interesting and eclectic clients and companies. Clients include (Past & Present) โ€ข Hackett โ€ข Ralph Lauren โ€ข H.Huntsman โ€ข V&A Museum โ€ข Savile Row Bespoke โ€ข Harrys of London โ€ข Shaftesbury Building Co. โ€ข BIMM (British and Irish Modern Music Institute) ๏ปฟ Chris Pollard Creative - Fashion promotion through graphic design and creative solutions

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CottageArts.net, LLC

*, Rice, MN, 56367, US
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

CottageArts.net, LLC, is a Minnesota Limited Liability Company. Since 2003 we have been helping to make your memories into lasting works of art. By sharing our digital scrapbooking and photography ideas and products with you, we hope that our site can be a place for you to be inspired each time you visit.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chris-pollard-creative.jpeg
Chris Pollard Creative
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cottagearts-net-llc.jpeg
CottageArts.net, LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Chris Pollard Creative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CottageArts.net, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chris Pollard Creative in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CottageArts.net, LLC in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Chris Pollard Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chris Pollard Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” CottageArts.net, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CottageArts.net, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chris-pollard-creative.jpeg
Chris Pollard Creative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cottagearts-net-llc.jpeg
CottageArts.net, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Chris Pollard Creative company and CottageArts.net, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CottageArts.net, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chris Pollard Creative company.

In the current year, CottageArts.net, LLC company and Chris Pollard Creative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CottageArts.net, LLC company nor Chris Pollard Creative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CottageArts.net, LLC company nor Chris Pollard Creative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CottageArts.net, LLC company nor Chris Pollard Creative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chris Pollard Creative company nor CottageArts.net, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chris Pollard Creative company nor CottageArts.net, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CottageArts.net, LLC company employs more people globally than Chris Pollard Creative company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X