Comparison Overview

Chipotle Mexican Grill

VS

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers

Chipotle Mexican Grill

610 Newport Center Dr, None, Newport Beach, California, US, 92660
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 700 and 749

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE: CMG) is cultivating a better world by serving responsibly sourced, classically-cooked, real food with wholesome ingredients without artificial colors, flavors or preservatives. Chipotle has over 3,250 restaurants in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Germany and is the only restaurant company of its size that owns and operates all its restaurants in North America and Europe. Chipotle is ranked on the Fortune 500 and is recognized on the 2023 list for Fortune's Most Admired Companies and Time Magazine's Most Influential Companies. With over 110,000 employees passionate about providing a great guest experience, Chipotle is a longtime leader and innovator in the food industry. Chipotle is committed to making its food more accessible to everyone while continuing to be a brand with a demonstrated purpose as it leads the way in digital, technology and sustainable business practices. For more information or to place an order online, visit www.chipotle.com.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 44,325
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers

6800 Bishop Rd, Plano, Texas, 75024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Founded by Todd Graves in 1996 in Baton Rouge, La., RAISING CANE'S CHICKEN FINGERS has over 800 restaurants in 41 states, with many new restaurants under construction. The company has ONE LOVE®—craveable chicken finger meals—and is continually recognized for its unique business model and customer satisfaction. RAISING CANE'S® vision is to grow restaurants, serving our Customers, all over the world and be the brand for craveable chicken finger meals, a great Crew, cool Culture, and Active Community Involvement.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 16,248
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chipotle-mexican-grill.jpeg
Chipotle Mexican Grill
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raising-cane's.jpeg
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chipotle Mexican Grill
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chipotle Mexican Grill in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers in 2025.

Incident History — Chipotle Mexican Grill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chipotle Mexican Grill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chipotle-mexican-grill.jpeg
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale (PoS) Systems
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raising-cane's.jpeg
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has not reported any.

In the current year, Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company and Chipotle Mexican Grill company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill company nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill company nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company employs more people globally than Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chipotle Mexican Grill nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N