Comparison Overview

Chinook Winds Casino Resort

VS

Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming

Chinook Winds Casino Resort

1777 NW 44th St, Lincoln City, OR, 97367, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Casino offers over 1100 slot machines including a non‐smoking section and a high stakes lounge. Table games include Blackjack, Craps, Roulette, Three Card Poker, Fortune Pai Gow Poker, Bonus Let‐It‐Ride, Poker, Keno and a 1,000 seat bingo hall. We offer headline entertainment monthly, comedy acts and signature outdoor events. The Convention Center accommodates major indoor events like mixed martial arts competitions, national pool tournaments, art shows and large charity fundraisers, conventions and gatherings including weddings and reunions. The Rogue River Steakhouse offers a panoramic a view of the Pacific Ocean. Rogue River Lounge heats up on weekends with a Live DJ and dancing. For guests who prefer a wide variety of dishes, the Siletz Bay Buffet delivers exactly that for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and a “Sparkling Sunday Brunch.” For a quick bite Euchre Creek Deli is always open, and features satisfying dishes swiftly served. Guests at Chinook Winds hotel are steps away from the beach and stunning sunsets. The hotel houses a whirlpool spa, indoor heated swimming pool and workout facility, 7,500 square feet of meeting space, Wi‐Fi and a complimentary shuttle to the casino. In the hotel complex is “Chinook’s Seafood Grill,” featuring a stunning view of the beach and a menu that highlights fresh seafood, with a Native-American twist. Chinook Winds Golf Resort is a fun 79 acre golf course. The 18‐hole course includes a pro‐shop, the only indoor driving range on the Oregon Coast, fitness center, Aces Sports Bar & Grill and meeting rooms.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 331
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Carnival Corporation's Global Gaming is the largest cruise ship casino company and we're still growing. The nine brands we work with collectively, Carnival Cruise Line, Princess Cruises, Holland America Line, Seabourn, P&O Cruises (Australia), Costa Cruises, AIDA Cruises, P&O Cruises (UK) and Cunard host nearly 13 million annual guests. Combined, these lines operate more than 90 cruise ships that visit over 700 ports of the most exciting destinations around the world. Our mission is to maintain an authentic and equitable culture where Global Gaming People can thrive, live, work and grow their careers. We aim to attract, develop, and retain those who fit our culture, while fostering an empowering environment that stimulates passion through engagement.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinook-winds-casino-resort.jpeg
Chinook Winds Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-casino-operations.jpeg
Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chinook Winds Casino Resort
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chinook Winds Casino Resort in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming in 2025.

Incident History — Chinook Winds Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chinook Winds Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinook-winds-casino-resort.jpeg
Chinook Winds Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-casino-operations.jpeg
Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: email (phishing or credential compromise)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Chinook Winds Casino Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Chinook Winds Casino Resort company has not reported any.

In the current year, Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company and Chinook Winds Casino Resort company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Chinook Winds Casino Resort company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Chinook Winds Casino Resort company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company nor Chinook Winds Casino Resort company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort company nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Chinook Winds Casino Resort company.

Chinook Winds Casino Resort company employs more people globally than Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chinook Winds Casino Resort nor Carnival Corporation - Global Gaming holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H