Comparison Overview

Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco

VS

Denver Botanic Gardens

Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco

750 Kearny St., 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94108, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cccsf.us

Chinese Culture Center, under the aegis of the Chinese Culture Foundation, is dedicated to elevating underserved communities and giving voice to equality through education and contemporary arts programming. We elevate Chinatown and other underserved communities by empowering youth and residents. Founded in 1965 and rooted in Chinatown, the Chinese Culture Center (or CCC) believes in a comprehensive community-building strategy that combines arts and education to create strong neighborhoods. Furthermore, we see Chinatown as a model of creativity and resilience for all underserved communities. We are a community-focused arts nonprofit. Our work is based in Chinatown and San Francisco's open and public spaces, and other art institutions. CCC’s activities include public art, contemporary exhibitions, and education programming. Over 150,000 members of the community engage with CCC annually. CCC is a proud partner of #StartSmall, the prestigious Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, San Francisco Foundation, Wells Fargo Foundation and the National Endowment for the Arts.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Denver Botanic Gardens

1007 York St., Denver, 80206, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.botanicgardens.org

Green inside and out, Denver Botanic Gardens is considered one of the top botanical gardens in the United States and a pioneer in water conservation. Accredited by the American Association of Museums, the Gardens’ living collections encompass specimens from the tropics to the tundra, showcasing a plant palette chosen to thrive in Colorado’s semi-arid climate. The Gardens'​ dynamic, 24-acre urban oasis in the heart of the city, offers unforgettable opportunities to flourish with unique garden experiences for the whole family – as well as world-class education and plant conservation research programs. Additional sites at Chatfield Farms, a 700-acre wildlife and native plant refuge in Jefferson County; and Mount Goliath, a high-altitude trail and interpretive site on the Mount Evans Scenic Byway, extend this experience throughout the Front Range.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 323
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-culture-center-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-botanic-gardens.jpeg
Denver Botanic Gardens
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Denver Botanic Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Botanic Gardens in 2025.

Incident History — Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Denver Botanic Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Botanic Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-culture-center-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-botanic-gardens.jpeg
Denver Botanic Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Denver Botanic Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Denver Botanic Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company.

In the current year, Denver Botanic Gardens company and Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company nor Denver Botanic Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company nor Denver Botanic Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Botanic Gardens company employs more people globally than Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References