Comparison Overview

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

VS

KlingStubbins

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

Building 3, Courtyard 5, Anding Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, Beijing, CN, 100029
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd (in short: China Construction; Stock code: 601668), formally established on December 10, 2007, was co-initiated by four Fortune Global 500 enterprises: China State Construction Engineering Corp. (CSCEC), China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), Baosteel Group Corporation Ltd and Sinochem Corporation. China Construction was successfully listed in Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 29, 2009. China Construction has inherited all superior assets and corporate culture of CSCEC, with its business covering housing construction, international contracting, real estate development and investment, infrastructure construction and investment, prospecting and design. China Construction is China’s largest construction and real estate conglomerate and biggest building work contractor. It is the largest transnational construction company in the developing countries and the top home builder in the world, taking the long lead of China’s international contracting business. China Construction is well known in the world for undertaking super high-rise, grand scale, cutting-edge and novel projects and has built up a great number of landmark projects in China and around the world. Such business concept and brand image of China Construction as “Providing Excellent Services across all Continents with Superior Quality as the Top Priority” is universally acknowledged and commended. China Construction is one of the most integrated construction and real estate conglomerates in China with the longest history of specialized operation and market-oriented management. It is the only construction enterprise in China certified for 3 top grade Qualifications of general contracting for building works, municipal public works and highway works, in addition to “1+4” qualifications and first-grade qualification for engineering design of building industry.

NAICS: 54131
NAICS Definition: Architectural Services
Employees: 36,973
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KlingStubbins

2301 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Kling Stubbins was acquired by Jacobs in 2011. Jacobs, with 2013 revenues of nearly $12 billion, is one of the world's largest and most diverse providers of technical, professional, and construction services. Building strong, long-term relationships with our clients is the key to our success as a company. This page will soon become inactive. Please connect with Jacobs and "follow" us here: http://www.linkedin.com/company/jacobs

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-state-construction-engrg.-corp.-ltd-cscec-.jpeg
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klingstubbins.jpeg
KlingStubbins
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KlingStubbins
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KlingStubbins in 2025.

Incident History — CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KlingStubbins (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KlingStubbins cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-state-construction-engrg.-corp.-ltd-cscec-.jpeg
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klingstubbins.jpeg
KlingStubbins
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KlingStubbins company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KlingStubbins company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company.

In the current year, KlingStubbins company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KlingStubbins company nor CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KlingStubbins company nor CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KlingStubbins company nor CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company nor KlingStubbins company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) nor KlingStubbins holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KlingStubbins company.

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company employs more people globally than KlingStubbins company, reflecting its scale as a Architecture and Planning.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) nor KlingStubbins holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) nor KlingStubbins holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) nor KlingStubbins holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) nor KlingStubbins holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) nor KlingStubbins holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) nor KlingStubbins holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H