Comparison Overview

China Southern Airlines

VS

easyJet

China Southern Airlines

181 Huanshi West Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

China Southern Airlines Official Account

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 5,840
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

easyJet

Hangar 89, London Luton Airport, GB, LU2 9PF
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We’re on a mission to make low-cost travel easy. Whatever your role, you’ll connect millions of people to what they love using Europe’s best airline network, great value fares, and friendly service. And to help us get there we’ll give you everything you need to make a personal impact on our growing business. We believe in sharing new opportunities, stepping up to challenges, and supporting each other with our Orange Spirit. Get ready to make a difference. Make it easyJet.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 11,413
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-southern-airlines.jpeg
China Southern Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/easyjet.jpeg
easyJet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Southern Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
easyJet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Southern Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for easyJet in 2025.

Incident History — China Southern Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Southern Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — easyJet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

easyJet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-southern-airlines.jpeg
China Southern Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/easyjet.jpeg
easyJet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Southern Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to easyJet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, easyJet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China Southern Airlines company.

In the current year, easyJet company and China Southern Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither easyJet company nor China Southern Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither easyJet company nor China Southern Airlines company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither easyJet company nor China Southern Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Southern Airlines company nor easyJet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Southern Airlines nor easyJet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

easyJet company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to China Southern Airlines company.

easyJet company employs more people globally than China Southern Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither China Southern Airlines nor easyJet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Southern Airlines nor easyJet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Southern Airlines nor easyJet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Southern Airlines nor easyJet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Southern Airlines nor easyJet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Southern Airlines nor easyJet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N