Comparison Overview

China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited

VS

Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant

China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited

B 49 Xisihuan Nanlu, Beijing, 100071, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as CRSC) is the provider of railway signal and communication technology, products and services, the precursor and leader in the China rail transit control industry, one of the biggest rail transit system solution provider. We provide specialized one-stop solution of design and integration, equipment manufacturing and system implementation services for rail transportation control systems to our customers and are the only authorized reviewer of rail transportation control system equipment modes, technology standards and product standards in the PRC. CRSC has 19 first-level subsidiaries, with a total number of 15, 000 employees. As the main initiator of China railway and urban transit control system technology application and innovation, CRSC established a whole set of China train control technology system and standards. With its systems and products widely applied to national railway and urban rail transit construction, CRSC has played a dominant leading role in the industry with huge influences. CRSC undertakes a number of key national scientific research projects, obtains many technological achievements leading over or at the international level in the field of the high speed railways, plateau railways, heavy loaded railways, speed increase of exiting railways and urban railway transit, and provides the strong support of technology for Chinese railways and urban transit. Standing at a new historical starting point, CRSC will always adhere to the philosophies of safe development, scientific development and “one major industry and diversified relative industries”. With the idea of innovation-driven development, CRSC will speed up the world-class enterprise of global competitiveness and try to make greater contributions to the development of rail industry both at home and abroad.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant

RU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

The Tikhvin Railway Car Building Plant (TVSZ) construction project was launched in 2005 in the town of Tikhvin in the Leningrad Region on the industrial site of the former “Transmash” plant. The managing company of the plant is CJSC “CTS”. The project foresees the construction of a state-of-the-art freight railcar building facility inclusive of up-to-date global technologies. The investments in the project implementation exceed $800 mln.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-railway-signal-&-communication-corporation-limited.jpeg
China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant in 2025.

Incident History — China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-railway-signal-&-communication-corporation-limited.jpeg
China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company.

In the current year, Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company and China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company nor China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company nor China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company nor China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant company employs more people globally than China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited nor Tikhvin Rail Cars Construction Plant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H