Comparison Overview

China National Petroleum Corporation

VS

ExxonMobil

China National Petroleum Corporation

None
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.cnpc.com.cn/en/aboutcnpc/aboutcnpc_index.shtml

Strong

CNPC is China's largest oil and gas producer and supplier, as well as one of the world's major oilfield service providers and a globally reputed contractor in engineering construction. With a presence in almost 70 countries, we are seeking an even greater international role. We provide energy in a profitable manner, and always attach great importance to our social and environmental responsibilities.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 534
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ExxonMobil

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
http://www.exxonmobil.com

The need for energy is universal. That's why ExxonMobil scientists and engineers are pioneering new research and pursuing new technologies to reduce emissions while creating more efficient fuels. We're committed to responsibly meeting the world's energy needs. We aim to achieve #netzero emissions from our operated assets by 2050 (for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions) and are taking a comprehensive approach to create emission-reduction roadmaps for major operated assets. Find us also on: YouTube.com/ExxonMobil Find our latest Privacy Policy at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/Global-legal-pages/privacy-policy See our terms and conditions at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/global-legal-pages/terms-and-conditions Find resources on our GHG emission reduction efforts here: https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/resources

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 61,842
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-national-petroleum-corporation.jpeg
China National Petroleum Corporation
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
China National Petroleum Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ExxonMobil
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China National Petroleum Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil in 2025.

Incident History — China National Petroleum Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China National Petroleum Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ExxonMobil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExxonMobil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-national-petroleum-corporation.jpeg
China National Petroleum Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: To protect corporate interests amid environmental scrutiny
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ExxonMobil company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to China National Petroleum Corporation company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

ExxonMobil company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas China National Petroleum Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, ExxonMobil company and China National Petroleum Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ExxonMobil company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ExxonMobil company has disclosed at least one data breach, while China National Petroleum Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ExxonMobil company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China National Petroleum Corporation company nor ExxonMobil company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

ExxonMobil company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to China National Petroleum Corporation company.

ExxonMobil company employs more people globally than China National Petroleum Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References