Comparison Overview

China National Petroleum Corporation

VS

Eram Holdings

China National Petroleum Corporation

None
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.cnpc.com.cn/en/aboutcnpc/aboutcnpc_index.shtml

Strong

CNPC is China's largest oil and gas producer and supplier, as well as one of the world's major oilfield service providers and a globally reputed contractor in engineering construction. With a presence in almost 70 countries, we are seeking an even greater international role. We provide energy in a profitable manner, and always attach great importance to our social and environmental responsibilities.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 534
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eram Holdings

6th Floor, Khobar Business Gate - Tower A P.O Box 4955 Al Khobar, SA
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.eramgroup.com

Eram Holdings, since its humble beginning in the 1990s, has experienced significant growth. Today, we have expanded into a business conglomerate operating in 9 business verticals with headquarters in Saudi Arabia, regional offices in India, UAE and with over 150 offices spread across 13 countries in Asia and Europe. Our journey continues to evolve as we seek new opportunities and embrace innovative strategies to further enhance our global presence. We are recognized in the industry for exemplary customer service and our subsidiaries have won several industry leading awards, reflecting our commitment to excellence. We have a strong team led by a functional board and experienced strategic business unit heads who have decades of experience backed by over 8000 employees from 25 different nationalities. Our regional presence has positioned us as a key industry partner for our clients. Job creation, creating value in the society we thrive, is the core theme of our operations. We believe in responsible business practices, inspiring the future, and placing a keen focus on localization in the countries we operate in. Our localization scores continue to increase every year which shows our commitment for development of localized value chain and ecosystem by investments and strategic acquisitions. We are dedicated to sustainability and shaping a future where everyone benefits, communities flourish, and the environment is protected. In the days ahead, all of Eram's entities are committed to ensuring compliance with ESG standards, enhancing environmental performance, minimizing our ecological footprint, and upholding strong governance to demonstrate our commitment to sustainable business practices across all operations. We are recognized for various humanitarian activities including initiatives and efforts to provide quality education to the less privileged.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-national-petroleum-corporation.jpeg
China National Petroleum Corporation
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eram-group.jpeg
Eram Holdings
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
China National Petroleum Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eram Holdings
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China National Petroleum Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eram Holdings in 2025.

Incident History — China National Petroleum Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China National Petroleum Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eram Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eram Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-national-petroleum-corporation.jpeg
China National Petroleum Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eram-group.jpeg
Eram Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both China National Petroleum Corporation company and Eram Holdings company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Eram Holdings company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China National Petroleum Corporation company.

In the current year, Eram Holdings company and China National Petroleum Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eram Holdings company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eram Holdings company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eram Holdings company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China National Petroleum Corporation company nor Eram Holdings company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China National Petroleum Corporation company nor Eram Holdings company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

China National Petroleum Corporation company employs more people globally than Eram Holdings company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References