Comparison Overview

China National Petroleum Corporation

VS

Complexul Energetic Oltenia

China National Petroleum Corporation

None
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.cnpc.com.cn/en/aboutcnpc/aboutcnpc_index.shtml

Strong

CNPC is China's largest oil and gas producer and supplier, as well as one of the world's major oilfield service providers and a globally reputed contractor in engineering construction. With a presence in almost 70 countries, we are seeking an even greater international role. We provide energy in a profitable manner, and always attach great importance to our social and environmental responsibilities.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 534
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Complexul Energetic Oltenia

A.I. Cuza Street, no. 5 Targu-Jiu, Gorj 210006, RO
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
https://www.ceoltenia.ro

CE Oltenia is the sole lignite producer in Romania and one of the major players in the energy services sector in Romania, set-up on 31 May 2012 following a decision of the Romanian Government for the reorganization of the energy sector through a merger between a national lignite company (Societatea Nationala a Lignitului Oltenia) and three energy producing companies (Complexul Energetic Rovinari, Complexul Energetic Turceni and Complexul Energetic Craiova). CE Oltenia has an installed production capacity of 3900 MWh and the sales of electricity are made on the wholesale energy market – bilateral agreements market, next day market, balance market, technological system services market, en detail market and green certificates market. The Company also produces thermal energy – mainly for the city of Craiova and sales coal to third parties, mainly electricity producers. The main raw material used for the production of electricity is lignite extracted from Oltenia basin.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-national-petroleum-corporation.jpeg
China National Petroleum Corporation
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/complexul-energetic-oltenia.jpeg
Complexul Energetic Oltenia
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
China National Petroleum Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Complexul Energetic Oltenia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China National Petroleum Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Complexul Energetic Oltenia in 2025.

Incident History — China National Petroleum Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China National Petroleum Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Complexul Energetic Oltenia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Complexul Energetic Oltenia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-national-petroleum-corporation.jpeg
China National Petroleum Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/complexul-energetic-oltenia.jpeg
Complexul Energetic Oltenia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both China National Petroleum Corporation company and Complexul Energetic Oltenia company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Complexul Energetic Oltenia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China National Petroleum Corporation company.

In the current year, Complexul Energetic Oltenia company and China National Petroleum Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Complexul Energetic Oltenia company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Complexul Energetic Oltenia company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Complexul Energetic Oltenia company nor China National Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China National Petroleum Corporation company nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China National Petroleum Corporation company nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

China National Petroleum Corporation company employs more people globally than Complexul Energetic Oltenia company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References