Comparison Overview

China Mobile International Limited

VS

vivo

China Mobile International Limited

Level 30, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Unit 9-18, Level 12, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-08
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cmi.chinamobile.com

China Mobile International Limited (CMI) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Mobile, mainly responsible for the operation of China Mobile's international business. In order to provide better services to meet the growing demand in the international telecommunications market, China Mobile established a subsidiary, CMI, in December 2010. CMI currently has 90+ terrestrial and submarine cable resources worldwide, with a total international transmission bandwidth of over 150T, and a total of 310 overseas PoPs. With Hong Kong, China as its launchpad, CMI has significantly accelerated global IDC development, creating a strong network for data centre cloudification. Leveraging the strong support by China Mobile, CMI is a trusted partner that provides comprehensive international information services and solutions to international enterprises, carriers and mobile users. Headquartered in Hong Kong, China, CMI has expanded its footprint in 39 countries and regions.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 1,719
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

vivo

No.283 BBK Road, Wusha, Chang'an, Dongguan, Guangdong, China, Dongguan, 523860, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vivo.com/en

vivo is a technology company that creates great products based on a design-driven value, with smart devices and intelligent services as its core. The company aims to build a bridge between humans and the digital world. Through unique creativity, vivo provides users with an increasingly convenient mobile and digital life. vivo has over 18,000 employees across the globe. While bringing together and developing the best local talents to deliver excellence, vivo is supported by a network of 10 R&D centers in Shenzhen, Dongguan, Nanjing, Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, Xi'an, Taipei, Tokyo and San Diego, focusing on the development of state-of-the-art consumer technologies, including 5G, artificial intelligence, industrial design, imaging system and other up-and-coming technologies. vivo has also set up 7 production bases (including brand-authorized manufacturing centers), across China, South- and Southeast Asia, and more regions, with an annual production capacity of nearly 200 million smartphones. As of now, vivo has branched out its sales network across more than 60 countries and regions, and is winning more than 400 million users worldwide with its superior products and services. Following the company's core values, which include Benfen, design-driven value, user-orientation, continuous learning and team spirit. vivo has implemented a sustainable development strategy, with the vision of developing into a healthier, more sustainable world-class corporation. Official Site: www.vivo.com/en Facebook: @vivoGlobal Instagram: @vivo_global

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18,472
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivo-smartphone.jpeg
vivo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Mobile International Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
vivo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Mobile International Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for vivo in 2025.

Incident History — China Mobile International Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Mobile International Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — vivo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

vivo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivo-smartphone.jpeg
vivo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Mobile International Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to vivo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, vivo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China Mobile International Limited company.

In the current year, vivo company and China Mobile International Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither vivo company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither vivo company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither vivo company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Mobile International Limited company nor vivo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor vivo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

China Mobile International Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to vivo company.

vivo company employs more people globally than China Mobile International Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor vivo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor vivo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor vivo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor vivo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor vivo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor vivo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References