Comparison Overview

China Mobile International Limited

VS

Reliance Communications

China Mobile International Limited

Level 30, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Unit 9-18, Level 12, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-08
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cmi.chinamobile.com

China Mobile International Limited (CMI) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Mobile, mainly responsible for the operation of China Mobile's international business. In order to provide better services to meet the growing demand in the international telecommunications market, China Mobile established a subsidiary, CMI, in December 2010. CMI currently has 90+ terrestrial and submarine cable resources worldwide, with a total international transmission bandwidth of over 150T, and a total of 310 overseas PoPs. With Hong Kong, China as its launchpad, CMI has significantly accelerated global IDC development, creating a strong network for data centre cloudification. Leveraging the strong support by China Mobile, CMI is a trusted partner that provides comprehensive international information services and solutions to international enterprises, carriers and mobile users. Headquartered in Hong Kong, China, CMI has expanded its footprint in 39 countries and regions.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 1,719
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Reliance Communications

A Block, 2nd Floor, Reliance Communications Limited, DAKC, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400710
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rcom.co.in

Reliance Communications Limited, founded by the late Shri Dhirubhai H Ambani (1932-2002), has Corporate clientele that includes 40,000 Indian and multinational corporations, including small and medium enterprises. Reliance Communications has established a pan-India, Next-Generation, digital network that is capable of supporting best-of-class services spanning the entire communications value chain. Reliance Communications owns and operates the world's largest Next-Generation IP-enabled connectivity infrastructure, comprising fiber optic cable systems in India, the USA, Europe, Middle East and the Asia Pacific region.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18,273
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Mobile International Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reliance Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Mobile International Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Communications in 2025.

Incident History — China Mobile International Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Mobile International Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reliance Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Mobile International Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reliance Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Reliance Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China Mobile International Limited company.

In the current year, Reliance Communications company and China Mobile International Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reliance Communications company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reliance Communications company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reliance Communications company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Mobile International Limited company nor Reliance Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Reliance Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

China Mobile International Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Reliance Communications company.

Reliance Communications company employs more people globally than China Mobile International Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Reliance Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Reliance Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Reliance Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Reliance Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Reliance Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Reliance Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References