Comparison Overview

China Mobile International Limited

VS

OPPO

China Mobile International Limited

Level 30, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Unit 9-18, Level 12, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-08
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cmi.chinamobile.com

China Mobile International Limited (CMI) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Mobile, mainly responsible for the operation of China Mobile's international business. In order to provide better services to meet the growing demand in the international telecommunications market, China Mobile established a subsidiary, CMI, in December 2010. CMI currently has 90+ terrestrial and submarine cable resources worldwide, with a total international transmission bandwidth of over 150T, and a total of 310 overseas PoPs. With Hong Kong, China as its launchpad, CMI has significantly accelerated global IDC development, creating a strong network for data centre cloudification. Leveraging the strong support by China Mobile, CMI is a trusted partner that provides comprehensive international information services and solutions to international enterprises, carriers and mobile users. Headquartered in Hong Kong, China, CMI has expanded its footprint in 39 countries and regions.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 1,719
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

OPPO

China Resources Tower, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN, 518000
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oppo.com/en

Founded in 2004, OPPO is one of the world's leading innovators of smart devices. With operations in over 60 countries and regions, OPPO's more than 290,000 points of sales and 1,900 official service centers share the beauty of technology with users all over the world. To forward our vision of a better future, OPPO has established ten smart manufacturing facilities around the world, as well as a global design center in London. Every day, our 40,000 employees put their heart and soul into exploring the possibilities of humanistic technology. OPPO is not just a device maker. We are a technology company that combines hardware with software and services. Our software range, built around the ColorOS operating system, makes devices more user-friendly and intelligent for our 500 million users worldwide. The OPPO App Market, OPPO Cloud also deliver smarter, more convenient, and better-connected services. Moving forward, OPPO will remain committed to our mission of "Technology for Mankind, Kindness for the World." We will continue to pursue innovation in the smart themes of learning, productivity, entertainment, and healthcare to meet the needs of people around the world. Constantly seeking technological breakthroughs. Make your moment with OPPO.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 52,214
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oppo.jpeg
OPPO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Mobile International Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OPPO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Mobile International Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

OPPO has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — China Mobile International Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Mobile International Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OPPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oppo.jpeg
OPPO
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Adjacent network access
Motivation: Unauthorized information disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

China Mobile International Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OPPO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

OPPO company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas China Mobile International Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, OPPO company has reported more cyber incidents than China Mobile International Limited company.

Neither OPPO company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OPPO company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OPPO company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

OPPO company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while China Mobile International Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor OPPO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

China Mobile International Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OPPO company.

OPPO company employs more people globally than China Mobile International Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor OPPO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor OPPO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor OPPO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor OPPO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor OPPO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor OPPO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References